The Eliminator Part 12

There were members of the Essenean brotherhood living there who were resorted to by individuals desiring instruction and discipline. Josephus himself went thither for that purpose. Paul evidently had a similar errand. He had been a Pharisee, but had embraced another faith.

Why did he choose the Esseneans in preference to the Judean apostles?

The answer must be that he was more certain of learning their tenets without adulteration. They were famous for their devotion to religious study, their cultivation of sacred literature and the art of prophecy, for their austerity, industry, and peculiar social organization. We shall find upon comparison that this was very closely resembling what is represented of the first believers at Jerusalem. They had their episcopacy, their deacons or stewards, their Holy Scriptures, and apostles or missionaries. These were numerous in Syria, Asia Minor, and Egypt. As the Therapeutae of the latter country resembled them, even to the signification of their name (healers, ministers), the probability is that the two were nearly identical. Eusebius, quoting the account of the Egyptian communes as given by Philo the Jew, has remarked the close similarity of their doctrines and customs with those of the apostolic congregations, and declared that they were Christians and their writings the Gospels.

This, however, is not tenable, at least not tenable in the way that he suggests. Unfortunately for his statement, the Essenean brothers existed, with all the peculiarities described, long before the Christian era. Josephus treats of them as flouris.h.i.+ng as early as the time of Jonathan, the first of the Maccabeans who held the office of high priest. About that period the canon of the Old Testament was finally collected. "Judas gathered together all those things that were lost by reason of the war we had (with Antiochos Epiphanes and his successors), and they remain with us" (2 Macc. 2: 14). The Maccabees or Asmoneans were partisans of the sect known as Asideans (Chaldeans), and afterward as Pharisees or Pa.r.s.ees. At this very period we first learn of the Sadducees or Zadokites, who chiefly belonged to the hereditary lineage of Aaron, and likewise of the Essenean fraternity. These last had their own sacred books, and took no part in the wors.h.i.+p and sacrifices of the temple. In short, they were regarded as a people apart. Their books, we have good reason to suppose, were different in tenor from those of the Old Testament, and it is by no means improbable that they included the scriptures written in Greek by the Alexandrians and now called the Apocrypha.

The designation _Minim_ may mean "observers of the heavens," and the Essenes appear to have been such. "Before sunrising," says Josephus, "they speak not a word about profane matters, but put up certain prayers which they have received from their forefathers, as if they made a supplication for its rising." This ill.u.s.trates the taunt to the Pharisees, that they could discern the face of the sky in regard to the weather, but could not read there the signs or symbols of the times, which were also written there.

The Saddukim were doubtless the disciples and partisans of Judas of Galilee, or Gaulonitis beyond Jordan. This man and his colleague Sadduk began their career at the time of the census or enrolment by Cyre-nius, which took place after the displacing of Arche-laus, the son of Herod I., from the throne of Judea. There are many plausible reasons for identifying them with the apostolic congregation. They established a new religious or philosophical sect, which Josephus declares had a great many followers, and laid the foundations of the subsequent miseries of the Jews. Their tenets agreed with those of the Pharisees; but, says the historian, "they have an inviolable attachment to liberty, and say that G.o.d is to be their only Ruler and Lord. They do not value any kinds of death, nor indeed do they heed the deaths of their relations and friends, nor can any such fear make them call any man lord." The Jewish nation, Josephus declares, was infected with this doctrine to an incredible degree. It is plain that the books interdicted in the _Talmud_ pertained to the sect which followed these teachers, and perhaps also to the Essenes.

The Gospels show evidence of having been compiled from previous works.

The one ascribed to Mark is apparently the more original, being shorter, more concise, and exhibiting fewer traces of having been tampered with.

The Gospel according to Matthew is from the same original, having whole sentences in exactly the same words, but it is amplified and more diffuse. Neither of these Gospels was recognized by Paul, and indeed there is much reason to doubt whether he had ever seen them. If he recognized any evangelic compilation as genuine, it was the one ascribed to Luke; and even then the treatise must have been rewritten after his period.

There exists abundant reason for regarding the Essenean wors.h.i.+p as more or less identical with that of Mithras, the Persian "G.o.d of heaven."

This appears to be sustained by a comparison of the cults. Thus, as has been remarked, they permitted no discourse on secular concerns before sunrise, but chanted prayers like the _Gathas_, as in supplication to the divinity presiding over the sky. Their personal habits exhibited a profound awe for the _Sun_. Their name itself was not peculiar to the fraternity of Palestine and Arabia, but was borne by the ascetic priests at Ephesus, whose manner of life was similar; and Plutarch informs us that certain _osioi_ (another form of the name) performed mystic rites in the temple of Apollo at Delphi in commemoration of Zagreus, the sun-G.o.d of the Orphic religion, who was slain and resuscitated.

The Persian theology is evidently the basis and source of Judaism. The symbolism of the universe afforded a model for their religion. After the conquest of Pontus and the pirate empire by Pompey, about 70 b. c., the wors.h.i.+p was introduced into the Roman empire. The verdict of Salamis was thus reversed. The defeat of Xerxes, who was a zealous propagandist, had a.s.sured the ascendency of Apollo at Delphi and Demeter at Eleusis over the religion of Ahura Mazda; but the conquest of the Mithras-wors.h.i.+ppers by Pompey resulted in the introduction of their rites into every part of the Roman world. From the river Euphrates to the Wall of Antoninus in Britain, and into the forests of Germany, Mithraism everywhere prevailed. For four centuries it disputed the supremacy with Christianity; and even when it was proscribed and forbidden by imperial authority, it still retained its hold upon the _pagani_ or inhabitants of the rural districts. The Templars and other secret fraternities of the Middle Ages were more or less similar in character to those of the Pa.r.s.ee sun-G.o.d, and the rites which we have heard denounced as magic and witchcraft were Mithraic ceremonies mingled with aboriginal customs.

Although the divinity is essentially Persian, we cannot but regard the secret wors.h.i.+p as an a.s.syrian inst.i.tution. M. Lajard has given an account of this cultus, which so generally supplanted the mystic wors.h.i.+p of the West.

The story of the temptation of Jesus, if read intelligently "between the lines," will be seen to indicate the characteristics of the Mithraic initiation. "Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee and was baptized by John. And straightway coming up out of the water he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him; and there came a voice from heaven saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. And immediately the Spirit driveth him into the wilderness, and he was there in the wilderness forty days tempted of Satan [Anra-mainyas], and was with the wild beasts; and the angels ministered to him."

These different clauses relate to different parts of the mystic ceremony.

The sojourn of the apostle Paul in Arabia, it is apparent, was for a purpose in close a.n.a.logy with that of Jesus in the wilderness, as already described. "It had pleased G.o.d," he says, "to reveal [or unveil]

his Son in me;" so, without conferring with anybody, he set forth on his holy errand, and upon his return began to preach a gospel which he declares was not according to man nor taught in lessons, but was received by the revelation. He was instructed at the fountain intuitively, and so was "not a whit behind the chiefest apostles." Hence in the utmost intensity of feeling he proclaimed, "If we, or even an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you, let him be accursed."

He goes on to recite the history of his career to show his entire independence of Judaism and the other apostles, and dwells upon his absolute rupture with Peter at Antioch on the ground of the adherence of the latter to the discarded restrictions of that religion.

The question now becomes pertinent, What is the purport of this "faith"?

In the fifteenth chapter of the First Corinthian Epistle he sets forth the chief points as follows: "I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received: how that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures; also that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day, according to the Scriptures; and that he was seen of Cephas, and after that of above five hundred brethren at once; after that he was seen of James, and then of all the apostles; and, last of all, he was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time."

It may appear strange to the common reader to be told that these matters, which the apostle sets forth with so much apparent confidence, are _mystic and arcane the transcript of older theologies and const.i.tuted throughout of astrologie symbolism._ The ancient faiths of the different peoples contain doctrines and dramatic narrative closely a.n.a.logous with the evangelic story of Jesus. The later Persians had the legend of Saoshyas (the savior), the son of the virgin Eredatferi, who conceives him in a miraculous manner. "He will appear and restore all things, after which he will himself become subordinate, that the Creator may be supreme and all in all."

In the Orphic drama, as it was performed by the Osians at the temple of Apollo at Delphi, the birth of Zagreus of the holy maid Persephoneia as the son of the Supreme Being, Zeus, is duly represented; then his proposed heirs.h.i.+p of the universe, his pa.s.sion and death; and finally his restoration again into life through a reincarnation as son of the virgin Semele under the new name of _Dionysos_. The myth was a.s.syrian, Semele being the same as Mylitta, the mystic mother, and her child, Shamas Dian-nisi, or the personified Sun, the Judge or Lord of mankind.

_The death, [pg 236] resurrection, and glorification of this Son of G.o.d were celebrated in the mystic dramas of several countries._

The legends of Atys in Asia Minor, of Adonis or Tammuz in Syria, of Osiris in Egypt, were derived from the same source. They cover the same field and have the same occult meaning. The apocalypse, or unveiling of the mystic purport of the sacred dramas to those considered worthy and competent to understand them, was the great object of initiation. The Gospels were regarded formerly as accounts of a tragedy of a.n.a.logous character. The higher functionaries of the Roman Catholic Church, we have reason to believe, have this same view, which is more than hinted in several places. Paul speaks unequivocally in this way of his gospel and the preaching or heralding of Jesus Christ, "_according to the revelation or unfolding of the mystery now made known to all nations for the obedience of faith._" When the disciples asked of Jesus why he spoke to the common mult.i.tude in parables he makes this reply: "Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the reign of G.o.d; but unto them that are without all these things are done in parables: that seeing they may see, and not perceive, and hearing they may hear, and not understand."

In these religious stories there is a very similar general outline.

There is a divine parentage and a career given; then the Holy One is put to death, the corpse is brought in for burial, the tragic occurrence is mourned by women, and the ceremonial is concluded by his resuscitation and ascension. There were varied phases of the representation, but they always had an intimate relation to the _seasons of the year and the a.n.a.logous occurrences in the world of nature_. Thus the supposed death more frequently occurred at the beginning of spring, and was mourned for a lenten period of forty days, which the vernal equinox brought to a close. Then funeral rites were performed, and after three days, in the case of Adonis, it was fabled that the G.o.d arose and ascended into the higher sky. In the Dionysia or Bacchic rite the G.o.d descended into h.e.l.l, the world of death, and brought thence his virgin mother, that they might be glorified together.

The Neo-Platonists taught that these occult rites were a form of representing philosophic and religious dogmas as if in scenes of common life by living persons, and of shadowing them by ceremonies and processions. This is more than hinted by Plato himself, and is undoubtedly true. The candidates were prepared for partic.i.p.ation by long periods of fasting and various purifications, moral and physical. The Eleusinia consisted of a drama of several days in duration, in which the abduction, or rather death, of Persephone and the wanderings of her mother Demeter served as the veil or _myesis_ to the doctrine of resurrection and life of eternity. The author of _The Great Dionysiak Myth_ has ably presented the various forms of the Bacchic rites with the same basis and denouement. Even the Hebrew Scriptures allude to the matter. The "mourning for the only one" is mentioned by Jeremiah, Amos, and Zechariah.

That the story of Jesus was in like manner a drama for religious ends, consisting of a miraculous parentage, a career of goodness, a pa.s.sion, death, resurrection, and ascension, is, to say the least, no improbable solution of the question.

It has also been noticed that the events of the seasons were denoted by the mystic symbolism. The sun, stars, constellations, and earth are commemorated in regard to their annual careers by these observances; whether because they were essential to the physical well-being of man or were especially appropriate for symbology different writers have conjectured differently, according to their own mental peculiarities.

Probably both are right, so far as their views extend.

It becomes us now to investigate the drama of the Gospels more carefully. The mythologic story of Mithras was probably a.s.syrian in detail, though Persian in first conception. It embraced the same notions as were denoted by the mysteries of the Western peoples, and hence the Mithraic wors.h.i.+p in a very great degree superseded the arcane religions of Asia Minor and Europe. Very naturally, as may easily be perceived, the _framework of the Gospel narrative is on the basis of these rites._ The influence of the other ancient faiths is also conspicuously manifest. The physical, and particularly the astronomic, features are everywhere present in the external structure of Christianity. Sir Isaac Newton was quick to perceive that the festivals of the Church had been fixed and arranged upon the observed phenomena of the heavens, and gave a detailed list of correspondences. It was not prudent, however, even in his time, for a man to say all he knew, and he carefully avoided the drawing of any conclusions which might encourage further inquiry in that direction.

It has already been suggested that the gospel of Paul was at the bottom Essenean and Mithraic; and in accordance with that hypothesis the crucifixion, death, burial, resurrection, and ascension would _be solar and astrologic events_. The Essenes, as well as the other Mithras-wors.h.i.+ppers, adored the sun and greeted his rising with invocations and sacred chants. The death and resurrection were "according to the Scriptures." In other words, they were duly set forth after the manner of literal occurrences in the sacred books of the Essenes long before Paul was born. The adepts of that fraternity understood the matter, and the hostility which they and the other disciples always exhibited toward the great apostle was because he divulged too much. His writings contained many _dysnoetic_ matters, Peter declared-many matters of higher knowledge improperly expressed, which they that are unlearned and unstable might wrest to their own hurt. According to the scriptures of the brotherhood, the drama of the Gospel had its denouement in the pa.s.sion and tragedy of Jesus. Paul, like a genuine adept, has accepted this narrative as the basis of his gospel; nevertheless, as though aware that it is a figurative rather than a literal occurrence, he nowhere speaks of the crucifixion as a crime.

We use the term _drama_ in this connection from a deliberate purpose, because we believe it correct. It was the designation of the matters represented in the Eleusinian, Dionysiac, and other arcane rites. The theatre of the Greeks consisted of such tragic and other representations, which were performed at the temples of Bacchus and aesculapius. Our modern theatre originated in like manner from the mysteries and mir-acle-plays of the Middle Ages, in which monks and priests acted the parts of the different persons of the Gospel drama.

The "Pa.s.sion Play," which excites so much interest in these modern times, is very suggestive, but little understood by sacerdotalists.

The Christian wors.h.i.+p in the earlier centuries was not so unlike or incongruous with the pagan customs as may have been supposed. The emperor Hadrian, when in Egypt, was forcibly impressed with the apparent ident.i.ty of the wors.h.i.+ppers of Serapis with those of Christ. "Those who wors.h.i.+p Serapis are Christians," he declared, "and those who call themselves Christian bishops are devotees of Serapis. The very patriarch himself when he came into Egypt was said by some to wors.h.i.+p Serapis and by others to wors.h.i.+p Christ."

The same ambiguity prevailed in the case of Christianity where it had been in contact with the arcane wors.h.i.+p of Mithras. Seel endeavors to explain the matter as one of policy. He states that the early Christians in Germany for the most part ostensibly paid wors.h.i.+p to the Roman G.o.ds in order to escape persecution. He makes a supposition as regards the adoption of the secret religion. "It is by no means improbable," says he, "that under the permitted symbols of Mithras they wors.h.i.+pped the Son of G.o.d and the mysteries of Christianity. In this point of view," he adds, "the Mithraic monuments so frequent in Germany are evidences of the secret faith of the early Christian Romans." We are not ready to accept this notion that the Christians paid homage to one G.o.d, meaning another at the same time, except on the hypothesis that they regarded Mithras and Jesus as virtually the same personification. This conclusion seems to be countenanced by Augustine, the celebrated bishop of Hippo.

"I know," says he, "that the wors.h.i.+ppers of the divinity in the cap [the statues of Mithras were decorated with the red Phrygian or cardinal's cap] used to say, 'Our G.o.d in the cap is Christian.'"

That the crucifixion of Christ was not a literal historic occurrence seems to require no argument. Besides, the first day of the Pa.s.sover was never a Friday, nor can it be according to the established principles of the Jewish calendar. The account in the three synoptic Gospels is therefore manifestly not correct as a literal occurrence; and the unknown writer of the Gospel of John has lamely attempted to evade the difficulty by placing the crucifixion on the day before the Pa.s.sover.

There was a mystic reason, however, for this statement of the synoptic Gospels. The story of the crucifixion had the same occult meaning as that of the departure of the Israelites from Egypt. The forty days in which Jesus "showed himself alive after his pa.s.sion" corresponded with the forty years of wandering in the wilderness. Hence, as the Israelites left Egypt on the first day of the Pa.s.sover, so Jesus was also crucified on that day. Not being an historical event, one actually occurring, the statement was permitted in order to preserve the harmony and ident.i.ty of the myths.

As, however, the story is astrological, we need only explain that the sun crossing the equinoctial line at the 21st of March is thus crucified, the ecliptic and the equator const.i.tuting the real cross in the form of the letter X. On the third day he appears ascending in the northern hemisphere, and so is "raised again according to the Scriptures."

Paul, while referring to these matters as _apparently historical_, never departs from their _symbolic_ import. In fact, he dwells upon this so emphatically that the events are only mentioned for the purpose of indicating his meaning more definitely. "I am crucified with Christ,"

says he; "they that are of Christ have crucified the flesh with its affections and l.u.s.ts." n.o.body will for a moment imagine that this crucifixion meant any physical violence, but only a casting off of those dispositions which are essentially unspiritual. "Our old man is crucified," Paul explains again, "in order that the body of sin might be destroyed;... likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto G.o.d." This is the real meaning of the death and resurrection as a spiritual matter. The external history which is so much insisted upon by the partisans of the letter vanishes utterly away before the eyes of him who perceives as well as sees, and understands through intelligence rather than by scientific and logical reasoning.

The early Fathers of the Church never scrupled to employ rites, symbols, and other agencies which had been previously used by the various priesthoods of the' pagan wors.h.i.+ps. The entire biography of Jesus, as it is set forth in the Gospels, exhibits unequivocally astrological features, and a resemblance to the narratives of the G.o.ds so close as to be equivalent almost to actual ident.i.ty. The miraculous conception was but a counterpart of many others: Atys, Adonis, Hercules, Bacchus, and aesculapius were fabled to have been sons of G.o.ds by human mothers. The 25th of December was also the birthday of Mithras; and Chrysostom, with characteristic sophistry and equivocation, explains the matter and justifies it as follows: "On this day also the birthday of Christ was lately fixed at Rome, in order that while the heathen were busied with their profane ceremonies the Christians might perform their holy rites undisturbed." He adds: "They call this the birthday of the Invincible One: who so invincible as the Lord that overthrew and conquered death?

They style it the birthday of the sun; he is the Sun of righteousness of whom Malachi speaks: 'Upon you who fear my name the Sun of righteousness shall arise with healing in his wings.'"

At the very outset a serious difficulty is encountered. When the Roman emperor Theodosius, fifteen centuries ago, decreed the universal authority of the Christian Church, he commanded also that all books of the philosophers and others not according to the new faith should be destroyed. This leaves only the collection known as the _New Testament_ and the writings of certain theologians, together with certain Gospels, Epistles, and Apocalypses denominated apocryphal which were extant during the earlier centuries of our era. In addition to this, there is internal evidence in the writings now regarded as canonical that they have been abridged, added to, and changed, so that the sense is more or less obscured and doctrines are affirmed which were not in the original doc.u.ments.

With the exception, perhaps, of some of the Epistles of Paul, James, and First Peter there is no evidence, or even probability, that any other book of the New Testament, whether Gospel, Epistle, or Apocalypse, was written, or even known, by the individual whose name it bears. Indeed, it is well known among students that the practice was formerly common to append the name of some distinguished personage to a letter or treatise and put it forth with this to commend it. "Our ancestors," says the philosopher Jamblichus, "used to inscribe their own writings with the name of Hermes, he being as common property to all the priests." Very significant, therefore, is the clause "according to" which occurs in the t.i.tle of every one of the four Gospels. Each of them has been in existence some fifteen or sixteen centuries "without father, without mother," or any other voucher or guarantee as evidence of the truth of the statements which it contains. We have no obligation to hesitate in our avowal that not one of the four reputed evangelists had anything to do with the production to which his name is affixed. The works must stand upon their intrinsic merits, and receive consideration accordingly.

Two centuries had pa.s.sed away after the beginning of the present era before the designation of _New Testament_ was used in connection with any collection of writings, and before any special authority was claimed for them. The men who first suggested their canonicity were Irenaeus of Lyons, Clement of Alexandria, and Tertullian of Carthage. Neither of these men, so far as is known, made any attempt to demonstrate that any book of the collection was genuine or authentic. Professor Davidson has declared in regard to the scribes who made the copies of the books of the _Old Testament_ that they did not refrain from changing what had been written or inserting fresh matter. The same course has been taken likewise with the text of the New Testament. Heretics and orthodox alike added to its matter in order to establish their peculiar dogmas. The text is nowhere pure. The doctrines of the Trinity, the Nativity of Jesus, his G.o.dhead and equality with the Father, the story of Mary, were all introduced from Egypt and engrafted into the Gospels.

Jesus is represented as having been born in a cave or stable at the moment of midnight. At that period the constellation Virgo is cut exactly in half by the eastern horizon, the sun itself being beneath in the zodiacal sign of Capricorn, which was also called "the Stable of Augeas" that Hercules was set to cleanse. Justin Martyr corroborates this by stating that Christ was born when the sun (Mithras) takes his birth in the stable of Augeas, coming as a second Hercules to cleanse a foul world. Hence the rosary of the Roman Catholic Church has this service: "Let us contemplate how the Blessed Virgin Mary, when the time of her delivery was come, brought forth our Redeemer at midnight and laid him in a manger."

By the cave, or _petra_, we may understand the cave of initiation, which was always employed in ancient mystic rites. There was such a cave at Bethlehem, and Jerome affirms that the mysteries of Adonis were celebrated there in his time. Justin has preserved the tradition that Mithras was born in a cave or petra, and Porphyry a.s.serts that his rites were observed in caves representing the vault of the heavens. The famous declaration to Peter owes all its significance to this fact: "Thou art Peter, and upon this rock (petra) I will build my Church; and the gates of h.e.l.l shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." Undoubtedly, this pa.s.sage is an interpolation; nevertheless, it is susceptible of explanation. Jesus having asked the twelve apostles who he was said to be, they reply: the "reincarnation"

of this or that prophet, as it was believed that such rebirth was usual among men. Peter then avows that he is the Son of G.o.d.

Significantly, Peter is not a Jewish proper name, but relates to function. It is a Semitic word denoting an interpreter of oracles. The priests of Apollo among the Gauls were denominated _pater_, as having the gift of prophecy. The residence of Balaam the prophet was called _Petur_, and there were oracles of Apollo at Patrai in Achaia and Patara in Asia Minor. When, therefore, it is announced that the Church would be built "upon this rock," we may understand it to be the apostle's oracular utterance that Jesus was the Son of G.o.d. The Church that was thus established consisted solely of adepts and initiates, the clergy only, and the higher functionaries at that. The laity only _belong to_ the Church: the others _are_ the Church.

The Roman Catholic hierarchy have for centuries caused the fiction to be promulgated that the apostle Peter founded the universal see of Rome.

This is like the mystic utterances of Jesus in speaking to the mult.i.tude in parables. The pope, cardinals, and prelates know the real truth.

There never took place, so far as any historical evidence exists, any visit, and much less the martyrdom, of the apostle Peter at Rome. The pope is not the successor of any Christian apostle whatever, but only of the pagan high priest. Under the republic and emperors the _pontifex maximus_ was the supreme religious dignitary. Julius Caesar held that office. He presided over the wors.h.i.+p and interpreted the sacred oracles.

It was a direction in the secret religion never to change the foreign names. The Chaldaic designation of the supreme pontiff and hierophant was _peter_. When the ancient wors.h.i.+p was suppressed the Roman bishop succeeded to the pontificate; and by this exaltation became vicar of the Lord and successor of the peter or pagan pontiff of Rome.

The tradition of the Magi or wise men coming from the east to wors.h.i.+p the infant Jesus, which was prefixed to the Gospel of Matthew, is pretty well set forth by the names given them: _Kaspar_, the white one; _Melchior_, the king of light; and _Balthasar_, the lord of treasures.

The additional legend that they travelled to Germany and were buried at Cologne grew out of the fact that the Mithraic wors.h.i.+p was prevalent in that region.

It should be borne in mind, while considering the astrologic character of the story of Jesus, that the divis-ion of the apparent path of the sun among the stars into the constellations which form the zodiac was made and known throughout the Oriental world and employed in its religious myths at an antiquity so remote as not to be known when the plan was devised. Astrological correspondences are carefully maintained all through the gospel narrative. The apostles represent the twelve months, each of them being sent or commissioned to announce him (the sun) to the people.

The special events and their dates are commemorated by the Church so as to be coincident with astrological data. The designation "Lamb of G.o.d"

comes directly from the fact that the crucifixion was placed at the time the sun crosses the equinoctial line in March, and so entered the zodiacal sign of Aries, the Lamb. He was thus "slain before the foundation of the world," or year, and takes away the sins or evils of winter. Having descended into h.e.l.l, or the winter period, he rises from the dead. He is now enthroned; the four beasts, denoting the four chief constellations in each quarter of the zodiacal circle-Taurus, Leo, Aquila, and Aquarius-adore him, and the twenty-four elders (or hours) fall down and wors.h.i.+p him. The miracle of turning water into wine is done every year, as Addison has sung,:

"May the sun refine The grape's soft juice and mellow it to wine."