BestLightNovel.com

Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe Part 19

Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe - BestLightNovel.com

You’re reading novel Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe Part 19 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy

This connection of the polar light with the most delicate cirrous clouds deserves special attention, because it shows that the electro-magnetic evolution of light is a part of a meteorological process. Terrestrial magnetism here manifests its influence p 197 on the atmosphere and on the condensation of aqueous vapor. The fleecy clouds seen in Iceland by Thienemann, and which he considered to be the northern light, have been seen in recent times by Franklin and Richardson near the American north pole, and by Admiral Wrangel on the Siberian coast of the Polar Sea. All remarked "that the Aurora flashed forth in the most vivid beams when ma.s.ses of cirrous strata were hovering in the upper regions of the air, and when these were so thin that their presence could only be recognized by the formation of a halo round the moon." These clouds sometimes range themselves, even by day in a similar manner to the beams of the Aurora, and then disturb the course of the magnetic needle in the same manner as the latter. On the morning after every distinct nocturnal Aurora, the same superimposed strata of clouds have still been observed that had previously been luminous.*

[footnote] *John Franklin, 'Narrative of a Journey to the Sh.o.r.es of the Polar Sea, in the Years 1819-1822', p. 552 and 597; Thienemann in the 'Edinburgh Philosophical Journal', vol. xx., p. 336; Farquharson, in vol.

vi., p. 392, of the same journal; Wrangel, 'Phys. Beob.', s. 59. Parry even saw the great arch of the northern light continue throughout the day.

('Journal of the Royal Inst.i.tution of Great Britain', 1828, Jan., p. 429.)

The apparently converging polar zones (streaks of clouds in the direction of the magnetic meridian), which constantly occupied my attention during my journeys on the elevated plateaux of Mexico and in Northern Asia, belong probably to the same group of ciurnal phenomena.*

[footnote] *On my return from my American travels, I described the delicate cirro-c.u.mulus cloud, which appears uniformly divided, as if by the action of repulsive forces, under the name of polar bands ('bandes polaires'), because their perspective point of convergence is mostly at first in the magnetic pole, so that the parallel rows of fleecy clouds follow the magnetic meridian. One peculiarity of this mysterious phenomenon is the oscillation, or occasionally the gradually progressive motion, of the point of convergence. It is usually observed that the bands are only fully developed in one region of the heavens, and they are seen to move first from south to north, and then gradually from east to west. I could not trace any connection between the advancing motion of the bands and alterations of the currents of air in the higher regions of the atmosphere. They occur when the air is extremely calm and the heavens are quite serene, and are much more common under the tropics than in the temperate and frigid zones. I have seen this phenomenon on the Andes, almost under the equator, at an elevation of 15,920 feet, and in Northern Asia, in the plains of Krasnojarski, south of Buchtarminsk, so similarly developed, that we must regard the influences producing it as very widely distributed, and as depending on general natural forces. See the important observations of Kamtz ('Vorlesungen uber Meteorologie', 1840, s. 146), and the more recent ones of Martins and Bravais ('Meteorologie', 1843, p. 117). In south polar bands, composed of very delicate clouds, observed by Arqago at Paris on the 23d of June, 1844, dark rays shot upward from an arch running east and west.

We have already made mention of black rays, resembling dark smoke, as occurring in brilliant nocturnal northern lights.

p 198 Southern lights have often been seen in England by the intelligent and indefatigable observer Dalton and northern lights have been observed in the southern hemisphere as far as 45 degrees lat.i.tude (as on the 14th of January, 1831). On occasions that are by no means of rare occurrence, the equilibrium at both poles has been simultaneously disturbed. I have discovered with certainty that northern polar lights have been seen within the tropics in Mexico and Peru. We must distinguish between the sphere of simultaneous visibility of the phenomenon and the zones of the Earth where it is seen almost nightly. Every observer no doubt sees a separate Aurora of his own, as he sees a separate rainbow. A great portion of the Earth simultaneously engenders these phenomena of emanations of light. Many nights may be instanced in which the phenomenon has been simultaneously observed in England and in Pennsylvania, in Rome and in Pekin. When it is stated that Auroras diminish with the decrease of lat.i.tude, the lat.i.tude must be understood to be magnetic, and as measured by its distance from the magnetic pole. In Iceland, in Greenland, Newfoundland, on the sh.o.r.es of the Slave Lake, and at Fort Enterprise in Northern Canada, these lights appear almost every night at certain seasons of the year, celebrating with their flas.h.i.+ng beams, according to the mode of expression common to the inhabitants of the Shetland Isles, "a merry dance in heaven."*

[footnote] *The northrn lights are called by the Shetland Islanders "the merry dancers." (Kendal, in the 'Quarterly Journal of Science', new series, vol. iv., p. 395.)

While the Aurora is a phenomenon of rare occurrence in Italy, it is frequently seen in the lat.i.tude of Philadelphia (39 degrees 57'), owing to the southern position of the American nagnetic pole. In the districts which are remarkable, in the New Continent and the Siberian coasts, for the frequent occurrence of this phenomenon, there are special regions or zones of longitude in which the polar light is particularly bright and brilliant.*

[footnote] *See Muncke's excellent work in the new edition of Gehler's 'Physik Worterbuch', bd. vii., i., s 113-268, and especially s. 158.

The existence p 199 of local influences can not, therefore, be denied in these cases. Wrangel saw the brilliancy diminish as he left the sh.o.r.es of the Polar Sea, about Mischne-Kolymsk. The observations made in the North Polar expedition appear to prove that in the immediate vicinity of the magnetic pole the development of light is not in the least degree more intense or frequent than at some distance from it.

The knowledge which we at present possess of the alt.i.tude of the polar light is based on measurements which from their nature, the constant oscillation of the phenomenon of light, and the consequent uncertainty of the angle of parallax, are not deserving of much confidence. The results obtained, setting aside the older data, fluctuate between several miles and an elevation of 3000 or 4000 feet; and, in all probability, the northern lights at different times occur at very different elevations.*

[footnote] *Farquharson in the 'Edinburgh Philos. Journal', vol. xvi., p.

304; 'Philos. Transact.' for 1829, p. 113.

[The height of the bow of light of the Aurora seen at the Cambridge Observatory, March 19, 1847, was determined by Professors Challis, of Cambridge, and Chevallier, of Durham, to be 177 miles above the surface of the Earth. See the notice of this meteor in 'An Account of the Aurora Borealis of Oct. 24, 1847', by John H. Morgan, Esq., 1848.] -- Tr.]

The most recent observers are disposed to place the phenomenon in the region of clouds, and not on the confines of the atmosphere; and they even believe that the rays of the Aurora may be affected by winds and currents of air, if the phenomenon of light, by which alone the existence of an electro-magnetic current is appreciable, be actually connected with matrial groups of vesicles of vapor in motion, or, more correctly speaking, if light penetrate them, pa.s.sing from one vesicle to another. Franklin saw near Great Bear Lake a beaming northern light, the lower side of which he thought illuminated a stratum of clouds, while, at a distance of only eighteen geographical miles, Kendal, who was on watch throughout the whole night, and never lost sight of the sky, perceived no phenomenon of light. The a.s.sertion, so frequently maintained of late, that the rays of the Aurora have been seen to shoot down to the ground between the spectator and some neighboring hill, is open to the charge of optical delusion, as in the cases of strokes of lightning or of the fall of fire-b.a.l.l.s.

Whether the magnetic storms, whose local character we have ill.u.s.trated by such remarkable examples, share noise as well as light in common with electric storms, is a question p 200 that has become difficult to answer, since implicit confidence is no longr yielded to the relations of Greenland whale-fishers and Siberian fox-hunters. Northern lights appear to have become less noisy since their occurrences have been more accurately recorded. Parry, Franklin, and Richardson, near the north pole; Thienemann in Iceland; Gieseke in Greenland; Lotur, and Bravais, near the North Cape; Wrangel and Anjou, on the coast of the Polar Sea, have together seen the Aurora thousands of times, but never heard any sound attending the phenomenon. If this negative testimony should not be deemed equivalent to the positive counter-evidence of Hearne on the mouth of the Copper River and of Henderson in Iceland, it must be remembered that, although Hood heard a noise as of quickly-moved musket-b.a.l.l.s and a slight cracking sound during an Aurora, he also noticed the same noise on the following day, when there was no northern light to be seen; and it must not be forgotten that Wrangel and Gieseke were fully convinced that the sound they had heard was to be ascribed to the contraction of the ice and the crust of the snow on the sudden cooling of the atmosphere. The belief in a crackling sound has arisen, not among the people generally, but rather among learned travelers, because in earlier times the northern light was declared to be an effect of atmospheric electricity, on account of the luminous manifestation of the electricity in rarefied s.p.a.ce, and the observers found it easy to hear what they wished to hear. Recent experiments with very sensitive electrometers have hitherto, contrary to the expectation generally entertained, yielded only negative results. The condition of the electricity in the atmosphere*

p 291 is not found to be changed during the most intense Aurora; but, on the other hand, the three expressions of the power of terrestrial magnetism, declination, inclination and intensity, are all affected by polar light, so that in the same night, and at different periods of the magnetic development, the same end of the needle is both attracted and repelled.

[footnote] *[Mr. James Glaisher, of the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, in his interesting 'Remarks on the Weather during the Quarter ending December 31st, 1847', says, "It is a fact well worthy of notice, that from the beginning of this quarter till the 29th of December, the electricity of the atmosphere was almost always in a neutral state, so that no signs of electricity were shown for several days together by any of the electrical instruments." During this period there were 'eight' exhibitions of the Aurora Borealis, of which one was the peculiarly bright display of the Aurora Borealis, of which one was the peculiarly bright display of the meteor on the 24th of October. These frequent exhibitions of brilliant Aurorae seem to depend upon many remarkable meteorological relations, for we find, according to Mr. Glaisher's statement in the paper to which we have already alluded, that the previous fifty years afford no parallel season to the closing one of 1847. The mean temperature of evaporation and of the dew point, the mean elastic force of vapor, the mean reading of the barometer, and the mean daily range of the readings of the thermometers in air, were all greater at Greenwich during that season of 1847 than the average range of many preceding years.] -- Tr.

The a.s.sertion made by Parry, on the strength of the data yielded by his observations in the neighborhood of the magnetic pole at Melville Island, that the Aurora did not disturb, but rather exercised a calming influence on the magnetic needle, has been satisfactorily refuted by Parry's own more exact researches,* detailed in his journal, and by the admirable observations of Richardson, Hood, and Franklin in Northern Canada, and lastly by Bravais and Lottin in Lapland.

[footnote] *Kamtz, 'Lehrbuch der Meteorologie', bd. iii., s. 498 and 501.

The process of the Aurora is, as has already been observed, the restoration of a disturbed condition of equilibrium. The effect on the needle is different according to the degree of intensity of the explosion. It was only unappreciable at the gloomy winter station of Bosekop when the phenomenon of light was very faint and aptly compared to the flame which rises in the closed circuit of a voltaic pile between two points of carbon at a considerable distance apart, or, according to Fizeau, to the flame rising between a silver and a carbon point, and attracted or repelled by the magnet. This a.n.a.logy certainly sets aside the necessity of a.s.suming the existence of metallic vapors in the atmosphere, which some celebrated physicists have regarded as the substratum of the northern light.

When we apply the indefinite term 'polar light' to the luminous phenomenon which we ascribe to a galvanic current, that is to say, to the motion of electricity in a closed circuit, we merely indicate the local direction in which the evolution of light is most frequently, although by no means invariably, seen. This phenomenon derives the greater part of its importance from the fact that the Earth becomes 'self-luminous', and that as a planet, besides the light which it receives from the central body, the Sun, it shows itself capable in itself of developing light. The intensity of the terrestrial light, or, rather the luminosity which is diffused, exceeds, in cases of the brightest colored radiation toward the zenith, the light of the Moon in its first quarter. Occasionally, as on the 7th of January, 1831, printed characters could be read without difficulty. This almost uninterrupted development of light p 202 in the Earth leads us by a.n.a.logy to the remarkable process exhibited in Venus. The portion of this planet which is not illumined by the Sun often s.h.i.+nes with a phosph.o.r.escent light of its own. It is not improbable that the Moon, Jupiter, and the comets s.h.i.+ne with an independent light, besides the reflected solar light visible through the polariscope. Without speaking of the problematical but yet ordinary mode in which the sky is illuminated, when a low cloud may be seen to s.h.i.+ne with an uninterrupted flickering light for many minutes together, we still meet with other instances of terrestrial development of light in our atmosphere. In this category we may reckon the celebrated luminous mists seen in 1783 and 1831; the steady luminous appearance exhibited without any flickeriing in great clouds observed by Rozier and Beccaria; and lastly, as Arago* well remarks, the faint diffused light which guides the steps of the traveler in cloudy, starless, and moonless nights in autumn and winter, even when there is no snow on the ground.

[footnote] *Arago, on the dry fogs of 1783 and 1831, which illuminated the night, in the 'Annuaire du Bureau des Longitudes', 1832, p. 246 and 250; and, regarding extraordinary luminous appearances in clouds without storms, see 'Notices sur la Tonnerre', in the 'Annuaire pour l'an. 1838', p. 279-285.

As in polar light or the electro-magnetic storm, a current of brilliant and often colored light streams through the atmosphere in high lat.i.tudes, so also in the torrid zones between the tropics, the ocean simultaneously develops light over a s.p.a.ce of many thousand square miles. Here the magical effect of light is owing to the forces of organic nature. Foaming with light, the eddying waves flash in phosph.o.r.escent sparks over the wide expanse of waters, where every scintillation is the vital manifestation of an invisible animal world. So varied are the sources of terrestrial light!

Must we still suppose this light to be latent, and combined in vapors, in order to explain 'Moser's images produced at a distance' -- a discovery in which reality has. .h.i.therto manifested itself like a mere phantom of the imagination.

As the internal heat of our planet is connected on the one hand with the generation of electro-magnetic currents and the process of terrestrial light (a consequence of the magnetic storm), it, on the other hand, discloses to us the chief source of geognostic phenomena. We shall consider these in their connection with and their transition from merely dynamic disturbances, from the elevation of whole continents and mountain chains to the development and effusion of gaseous and p 203 liquid fluids, of hot mud, and of those heated and molten earths which become solidified into crystalline mineral ma.s.ses. Modern geognosy, the mineral portion of terrestrial physics, has made no slight advance in having investigated this connection of phenomena. This investigation has led us away from the delusive hypothesis, by which it was customary formerly to endeavor to explain, individually every expression of force in the terrestrial globe: it shows us the connection of the occurrence of heterogeneous substances with that which only appertains to changes in s.p.a.ce (disturbances or elevations), and groups together phenomena which at first sight appeared most heterogeneous, as thermal springs, effusion of carbonic acid and sulphurous vapor, innocuous salses (mud eruptions), and the dreadful devastation of volcanic mountains.*

[footnote] *[See Mantell's 'Wonders of Geology', 1848, vol. i., p. 34, 36, 105; also Lyell's 'Principles of Geology', vol. ii., and Daubeney 'On Volcanoes', 2d ed., 1848, Part ii., ch. x.x.xii., x.x.xiii.] -- Tr.

In a general view of nature, all these phenomena are fused together in one sole idea of the reaction of the interior of a planet on its external surface. We thus recognize in the depths of the earth, and in the increase of temperature with the increase of depth from the surface, not only the germ of disturbing movements, but also of the gradual elevation of whole continents (as mountain chains on long fissures), of volcanic eruptions, and of the manifold production of mountains and mineral ma.s.ses. The influence of this reaction of the interior on the exterior is not, however, limited to inorganic nature alone. It is highly probable that, in an earlier world, more powerful emanations of carbonic acid gas, blended with the atmosphere, must have increased the a.s.similation of carbon in vegetables, and that an inexhaustible supply of combustible matter (lignites and carboniferous formations) must have been thus buried in the upper strata of the earth by the revolutions attending the destruction of vast tracts of forest. We likewise perceive that the destiny of mankind is in part dependent on the formation of the external surface of the earth, the direction of mountain tracts and high lands, and on the distribution of elevated continents. It is thus granted to the inquiring mind to pa.s.s from link to link along the chain of phenomena until it reaches the period when, in the solidifying process of our planet, and in its first transition from the gaseous form to the agglomeration of matter, that portion of the inner heat of the Earth was developed, which does not belong to the action of the Sun.

This material taken from pages 204-248

COSMOS: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe, Vol. 1 by Alexander von Humboldt

Translated by E C Otte

from the 1858 Harper & Brothers edition of Cosmos, volume 1 --------------------------------------------------

p 204 In order to give a general delineation of the causal connection of geognostical phenomena, we will begin with those whose chief characteristic is dynamic, consisting in motion and in change in s.p.a.ce. Earthquakes manifest themselves by quick and successive vertical, or horizontal, or rotatory vibrations.*

[footnote] *[See Daubeney 'On Volcanoes', 2d ed., 1848, p. 509.] -- Tr.

In the very considerable number of earthquakes which I have experienced in both hemispheres, alike on land and at sea, the two first-named kinds of motion have often appeared to me to occur simultaneously. The mine-like explosiion -- the vertical action from below upward -- was most strikingly manifested in the overthrow of the town of Riobamba in 1797, when the bodies of many of the inhabitants were found to have been hurled to Cullea, a hill several hundred feet in neight, and on the opposite side of the River Lican.

The propagation is most generally effected by undulations in a linear direction,* with a velocity of from twenty to twenty-eight miles in a minute, but partly in circles of commotion or large ellipses, in which the vibrations are propagated with decreasing intensity from a center toward the circ.u.mference.

[footnote] *[On the linear direction of earthquakes, see Daubeney 'On Volcanoes', p. 515.] -- Tr.

There are districts exposed to the action of two intersecting circles of commotion. In Northern Asia, where the Father of History,* and subsequently Theophylactus Simocatta,** described the districts of Scythia as free from earthquakes, I have observed the metalliferous portion of the Altai Mountains under the influence of a two-fold focus of commotion, the Lake of Baikal, and the volcano of the Celestial Mountain (Thianschan).***

[footnote] *Herod, iv., 28. The prostration of the colossal statue of Memnon, which has been again restored (Letronne, 'La Statue Vocale de Memnon', 1835, p. 25, 26), presents a fact in opposition to the ancient prejudice that Egypt is free from earthquakes (Pliny, ii., 80); but the valley of the Nile does lie external to the circle of commotion of Byzantium, the Archipelago, and Syria (Ideler ad Aristot., 'Meteor.', p.

584).

Please click Like and leave more comments to support and keep us alive.

RECENTLY UPDATED MANGA

Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe Part 19 summary

You're reading Cosmos: A Sketch of the Physical Description of the Universe. This manga has been translated by Updating. Author(s): Alexander von Humboldt. Already has 722 views.

It's great if you read and follow any novel on our website. We promise you that we'll bring you the latest, hottest novel everyday and FREE.

BestLightNovel.com is a most smartest website for reading manga online, it can automatic resize images to fit your pc screen, even on your mobile. Experience now by using your smartphone and access to BestLightNovel.com