A Reply to Dr. Lightfoot's Essays - BestLightNovel.com
You’re reading novel A Reply to Dr. Lightfoot's Essays Part 12 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
Haer._ iii. 3, 4. It should be ii. 22, 5.
[51:3] _Ibid._ p. 181.
[51:4] _H.E._ iii, 24.
[52:1] _H.E._ ii. 23.
[52:2] _Ibid._ iii. 11.
[52:3] _Ibid._ 16.
[52:4] _Ibid._ 19, 20.
[52:5] _Ibid._ 32.
[52:6] _Ibid._ iv. 8.
[52:7] _Ibid._ 11.
[52:8] _Ibid._ iv. 22.
[53:1] _H.E._ ii. 15.
[53:2] _Ibid._ vii. 25.
[54:1] _H.E._ iii. 18.
[54:2] _Ibid._ 19, 20.
[54:3] _Ibid._ 20.
[54:4] _Ibid._ 20.
[54:5] _Ibid._ 23.
[54:6] _Ibid._ 24.
[55:1] I am much obliged to Dr. Lightfoot for calling my attention to the accidental insertion of the words "and the Apocalypse" (_S.R._ i.
p. 433). This was a mere slip of the pen, of which no use is made, and the error is effectually corrected by my own distinct statements.
[55:2] _H.E._ iii. 39.
[56:1] _Contemporary Review_, January 1875, p. 183 [_ibid._ p. 51].
[57:1] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 337 ff. [_ibid._ p. 59 ff.]
[58:1] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 339 [_ibid._ p. 62].
[59:1] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 340 [_ibid._ p. 63].
[59:2] _S.R._ i. p. 263 f. I have introduced numbers for facility of reference.
[60:1] Dr. Lightfoot says in this volume: "The reading 'most' is explained in the preface to that edition as a misprint" (p. 63, n. 2).
Not so at all. "A slip of the pen" is a very different thing.
[60:2] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 341 [_ibid._ p. 64].
[61:1] _Ueber d. Urspr. u.s.w. des Christennamens_, p. 7, Anm. 1.
[61:2] _Zeitschr. wiss. Theol._ 1874, p. 211, Anm. 1. I should have added that the priority which Lipsius still maintains is that of the text, as Dr. Lightfoot points out in his _Apostolic Fathers_ (part ii.
vol. i. 1885, p. 273, n. 1), and not of absolute origin; but this appears clearly enough in the quotations I have made.
[61:3] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 841 [_ibid._ p. 65].
[62:1] _S.R._ i. p. 259 f.
[62:2] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 342 [_ibid._ p, 65 f.]
[62:3] _S.R._ i. p. 259.
[63:1] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 342. In a note Dr.
Lightfoot states that my references to Lipsius are to his earlier works, where he still maintains the priority and genuineness of the Curetonian Epistles. Certainly they are so: but in the right place, two pages further on, I refer to the writings in which he rejects the authenticity, whilst still maintaining his previous view of the priority of these letters [_ibid._ p. 66].
[64:1] Calvin's expressions are: "Nihil naeniis illis, quae sub Ignatii nomine editae sunt, putidius. Quo minus tolerabilis est eorum impudentia, qui talibus larvis ad fallendum se instruunt" (_Inst. Chr.
Rel._ i. 13, -- 39).
[64:2] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 342.
[64:3] _Op. Theolog._ 1652, 11, p. 1085.
[64:4] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 342 [_ibid._ p. 66].
Dr. Lightfoot refers to Pearson's _Vindiciae Ignat._ p. 28 (ed. Churton).
[65:1] _Exam. Concilii Tridentim_, 1614, i. p. 85 (misprinted 89).
[65:2] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 343 [_ibid._ p. 67].
[67:1] _Critici Sacri_, lib. ii cap. 1; _Op. Theolog._ 1652, ii. p. 1086.
[67:2] _Vind. Ignat._ 1672, p. 14 f.; Jacobson, _Patr. Apost._ i.
p. x.x.xviii.
[67:3] _Op de Theolog. Dogmat., De Eccles. Hierarch._ v. 8 -- 1, edit.
Venetiis, 1757, vol. vii.
[68:1] _Contemporary Review_, February 1875, p. 343 f. [_ibid._ p. 67 f.]
[70:1] _Die Kirche im ap. Zeit._ p. 322.
