Human. Part 16

108. Flombaum, J.I., and Santos, L.R. (2005). Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others. Current Biology 15: 44752.

109. Santos, L.R., Flombaum, J.I., and Phillips, W. (2007). The evolution of human mindreading: How nonhuman primates can inform social cognitive neuroscience. In Platek, S.M., Keenan, J.P., and Shackelford, T.K. (eds.), Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

110. Miklosi, A., Topal, J., and Csanyi, V. (2004). Comparative social cognition: What can dogs teach us? Animal Behaviour 67: 9951004.

111. For a review, see: Hare, B., and Tomasello, M. (2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 43944.

112. Belyaev, D. (1979). Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity 70: 3018.

Chapter 6: WHAT'S UP WITH THE ARTS?.

1. Dissanayake, E. (1988). What Is Art For? Seattle: University of Was.h.i.+ngton Press.

2. Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. New York: W.W. Norton.

3. Cela-Conde, C.C.J., Marty, G., Maestu, F., Ortiz, T., Munar, E., Fernandez, A., Roca, M., Rossello, J., and Quesney, F. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 632125.

4. American Heritage College Dictionary, 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

5. Aiken, N.E. (1998). The Biological Origins of Art. Westport, CT: Praeger.

6. Kawabata, H., and Zeki, S. (2003). Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology 91: 16991705.

7. Lindgaard, G., and Whitfield, T.W. (2004). Integrating aesthetics within an evolutionary and psychological framework. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5: 7390.

8. Norman, D.A. (2004). Introduction to this special section on beauty, goodness, and usability. Human-Computer Interaction 19: 31118.

9. Humphrey, N.K. (1973). The illusion of beauty. Perception 2: 42939.

10. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., and Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8: 36482.

11. Her description can be heard at http://cdbaby.com/cd/lyonsgoodall.

12. Morris, D. (1962). The Biology of Art: A Study of the Picture-Making Behaviour of the Great Apes and Its Relations.h.i.+p to Human Art. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

13. BBC News, June 20, 2005.

14. s.h.i.+ck, K.D., and Toth, N. (1993). Making Silent Stones Speak: Human Evolution and the Dawn of Technology. New York: Simon & Schuster.

15. Mithen, S. (2004). The evolution of imagination: An archeological perspective. Substance 94/95: 2854.

16. Wynn, T. (1995). Handaxe enigmas. World Archaeology 27: 1024.

17. Mithen, S. (2001). The evolution of imagination: An archaeological perspective. Substance 30: 2854.

18. Miller, G. (2000). The Mating Mind. New York: Doubleday.

19. Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L. (2001). Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts. Substance 30: 627.

20. Leslie, A. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind." Psychological Review 94: 41226.

21. Thorpe, W. (1958). The learning of song patterns by birds, with special reference to the song of the chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs. Ibis 100: 53570.

22. Almli, C.R., and Stanley, F. (1987). Neural insult and critical period concepts. In Bornstein, M.H. (ed.), Sensitive Periods in Development: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 12343). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

23. Boyer, P. (in press 2007). Specialised inference engines as precursors of creative imagination? Forthcoming in Roth, I. (ed.), Imaginative Minds. London: British Academy.

24. Carroll, J. (2007). The adaptive function of literature. In Petrov, V., Martin-dale, C., Locher, P., and Petrov, V.M. (eds.), Evolutionary and Neurocognitive Approaches to Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publis.h.i.+ng.

25. Haidt, J. (2006). The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. New York: Basic Books.

26. Tractinsky, N., c.o.khavi, A., Kirschenbaum, M. (2004). Using ratings and response latencies to evaluate the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on HC I Research in MIS. Was.h.i.+ngton, DC, December 1011.

27. Uduehi, J. (1995). A cross cultural a.s.sessment of the Maitland-Graves design judgment test using U.S. and Nigerian subjects. Visual Arts Research 13: 1118.

28. Humphrey, D. (1997). Preferences in symmetries and symmetries in drawings: asymmetries between ages and s.e.xes. Empirical Studies of the Arts 15: 4160.

29. Mller, A.P., and Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and s.e.xual selection: A meta-a.n.a.lysis. American Naturalist 15: 17492.

30. Thornhill, R., and Mller, A.P. (1997). Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biological Reviews 72: 497548.

31. Perrett, D.I., Burt, D.M., Penton-Voak, I.S., Lee, K.J., Rowland, D.A., and Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 20: 295307.

32. Manning, J.T., Koukourakis, K., and Brodie, D.A. (1997). Fluctuating asymmetry, metabolic rate and s.e.xual selection in human males. Evolution and Human Behavior 18: 1521.

33. Thornhill, R., and Gangestad, S.W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and s.e.xual behavior. Psychological Science 5: 297302.

34. Gangestad, S.W., and Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extra-pair s.e.x: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior 18: 6988.

35. Scutt, D., Manning, J.T., Whitehouse, G.H., Leinster, S.J., and Ma.s.sey, C.P. (1997). The relations.h.i.+p between breast asymmetry, breast size and occurrence of breast cancer. British Journal of Radiology 70: 101721.

36. Manning, J.T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G.H., and Leinster, S.J. (1997). Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior 18: 22336.

37. Mller, A.P., Soler, M., and Thornhill, R. (1995). Breast asymmetry, s.e.xual selection, and human reproductive success. Evolution and Human Behavior 16: 20719.

38. Perrett, D.I., Burt, D.M., Penton-Voak, I.S., Lee, K.J., Rowland, D.A., and Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 20: 295307.

39. Thornhill, R., and Gangestad, S.W. (1999). The scent of symmetry: A human s.e.x pheromone that signals fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior 20: 175201.

40. Hughes, S.M., Harrison, M.A., and Gallup, G.G., Jr. (2002). The sound of symmetry: Voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evolution and Human Behavior 23: 17378.

41. Cunningham, M.R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 92335.

42. Perrett, D.I., May, K.A., and Yos.h.i.+kawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368: 23942.

43. Langlois, J.H., Ritter, J.M., Roggman, L.A., and Vaughn, L.S. (1991). Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Developmental Psychology 27: 7984.

44. Lawsmith, M.J., Perrett, D.I., Jones, B.C., Cornwell, R.E., Moore, F.R., Feinberg, D.R., Boothroyd, L.G., et al. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 273: 143540.

45. Moshe, B., and Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science 17: 64548.

46. Latto, R. (1995). The brain of the beholder. In Gregory, R., Harris, J., Heard, P., and Rose, D. (eds.), The Artful Eye (pp. 6694). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

47. Jastrow, J. (1892). On the judgment of angles and positions of lines. American Journal of Psychology 5: 21448.

48. Latto, R. (2004). Do we like what we see? In Malcolm, G. (ed.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Visual Representations and Interpretations (pp. 34356). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

49. Ulrich, R.S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 13: 2944.

50. Ulrich, R.S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia and natural landscapes. In Kellert, S., and Wilson, E.O. (eds.), The Biophilia Hypothesis (pp. 73137). Was.h.i.+ngton, DC: Island Press.

51. Ulrich, R.S. (1984). View through window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224: 42021.

52. Balling, J.D., and Falk, J.H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior 14: 528.

53. Lohr, V.I., and Pearson-Mims, C.H. (2006). Responses to scenes with spreading, rounded, and conical tree forms. Environment and Behavior 38: 66788.

54. Orians, G.H. (1980). Habitat selection: General theory and applications to human behavior. In Lockard, J.S. (ed.), The Evolution of Human Social Behavior. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

55. Taylor, R.P. (1998). Splashdown. New Scientist 2144:3031.

56. Sprott, J. (2004). Can a monkey with a computer create art? Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 8: 10314.

57. Aks, D.J., and Sprott, J.C. (1996). Quantifying aesthetic preference for chaotic patterns. Empirical Studies of the Arts 14: 119.

58. Wise, J.A., and Rosenberg, E. (1986). The effects of interior treatments on performance stress in three types of mental tasks. Technical Report s.p.a.ce. Sunnyvale, CA: Human Factors Office, NASA-ARC.

59. Wise, J.A., and Taylor, R.P. (2002). Fractal design strategies for enhancement of knowledge work environments. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, Baltimore.

60. Spehar, B., Clifford, C., Newell, B., and Taylor, R.P. (2004). Universal aesthetic of fractals. Chaos and Graphics 37: 81320.

61. Mandelbrot, B.B. (2001). Fractals and art for the sake of science. In Emmer, M. (ed.), The Visual Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

62. Taylor, R.P. (2006). Reduction of physiological stress using fractal art and architecture. Leonardo 39: 24551.

63. Hagerhall, C., Purcell, T., and Taylor, R.P. (2004). Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette as a predictor for landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 24755.

64. Hauser, M.D., and McDermott, J. (2006). Thoughts on an empirical approach to the evolutionary origins of music. Music Perception 24: 11116.

65. Marler, P. (1990). Song learning: The interface between behaviour and neuroethology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 329: 10914.

66. Brown, D. (1991). Human Universals. New York: McGraw-Hill.

67. Blacking, J. (1995). Music, Culture and Experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

68. Merriam, A.P. (1964). The Anthropology of Music. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

69. Huron, D. (2001). Is music an evolutionary adaptation? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 930: 4361.

70. Zhang, J., Haarottle, G., w.a.n.g, C., and Kong, Z. (1999). Oldest playable music instruments found at Jiahua early Neolithic site in China. Nature 401: 36668.

71. Hagen, E.H., and Bryant, G.A. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signaling system. Human Nature 14: 2151.

72. Fitch, T. (2006). On the biology and evolution of music. Music Perception 24: 8588.

73. Levitin, D.J. (1994). Absolute memory for musical pitch: Evidence from the production of learned melodies. Perception & Psychophysics 56: 41423.

74. Levitin, D.J., and Cook, P.R. (1996). Memory for musical tempo: Additional evidence that auditory memory is absolute. Perception & Psychophysics 58: 92735.

75. Trehub, S.E. (2003). Toward a developmental psychology of music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 999: 40213.

76. Wright, A.A., Rivera, J.J., Hulse, S.H., et al. (2000). Music perception and octave generalization in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 291307.

77. Gagnon, T., Hunse, C., Carmichael, L., Fellows, F., and Patrick, J. (1987). Human fetal responses to vibratory acoustic stimulation from twenty-six weeks to term. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 157: 137584.

78. Koelsch, S., and Siebel, W.A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 9:57884.

79. Koelsch, S., Kasper, E., Sammler, D., Schulze, K., Gunter, T., and Friederici, A.D. (2004). Music, language and meaning: Brain signatures of semantic processing. Nature Neuroscience 7: 3027.

80. Fitch, W.T., and Hauser, M.D. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303: 37780.

81. Levitin, D.J., and Menon, V. (2003). Musical structure is processed in "language" areas of the brain: A possible role for Brodmann area 47 in temporal coherence. NeuroImage 20: 214252.

82. Tillmann, B., Janata, P., and Bharucha, J.J. (2003). Activation of the inferior frontal cortex in musical priming. Cognitive Brain Research 16: 14561.

83. Koelsch, S., Gunter, T.C., von Cramon, D.Y., Zysset, S., Lohmann, G., and Friederici, A.D. (2002). Bach speaks: A cortical "language-network" serves the processing of music. NeuroImage 17: 95666.

84. Voss, R.F., and Clarke, J. (1978). 1/f noise in music and speech. Nature 258: 31718.

85. De Coensel, B., Botterdooren, D., and De Muer, T. (2003). 1/f noise in rural and urban soundscapes. Acta Acoustica 89: 28795.

86. Garcia-Lazaro, J.A., Ahmed, B., and Schnupp, J.W.H. (2006). Tuning to natural stimulus dynamics in primary auditory cortex. Current Biology 7: 26471.

87. Rieke, F., Bodnar, D.A., and Bialek, W. (1995). Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 262: 25965.

88. Krumhansl, C.L. (1997). An exploratory study of musical emotions and psychophysiology. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 51: 33653.

89. Pancept, J. (1995). The emotional sources of "chills" induced by music. Music Perception 13: 171207.

90. Goldstein, A. (1980). Thrills in response to music and other stimuli. Physiological Psychology 8: 12629.

91. Blood, A.J., and Zatorre, R.J. (2001. Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 1181823.