The Appendages, Anatomy, and Relationships of Trilobites - BestLightNovel.com
You’re reading novel The Appendages, Anatomy, and Relationships of Trilobites Part 2 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
22), each exopodite consists of a single long, broad, leaf-like blade, not with many segments as in _Triarthrus_, but consisting of a large basal and small terminal lobe. It bears on its outer margin numerous relatively short, slender, flat setae. The long axes of the exopodites point forward, and the setae are directed forward and outward. They stand more nearly at right angles to the shaft on the cephalic exopodites than on those of the thorax. This same type of broad-bladed exopodite is also found on the thorax and pygidium.
The number of functional gnathobases on the cephalon is unknown. That four endopodites were present on one side is shown pretty clearly by specimen 58591 (pl. 16, fig. 3) and while no more than two well preserved exopodites have been seen on a side, there probably were four. Specimen 65513 (pl. 16, fig. 1) shows gnathobases on the second and third appendages of that individual as preserved, but there is no positive evidence that these are really the second and third appendages, for they are obviously displaced. The hypostoma of Neolenus is narrow but long, several specimens showing that it extended back to the horizon of the outer ends of the last pair of glabellar furrows. It is not as wide as the axial lobe, so that, while gnathobases attached beneath the first pair of furrows would probably not reach back to the posterior end of the hypostoma, they might lie parallel to it and not extend beneath. It seems possible, then, that there were four pairs of endobases but that the second rather than the first pair served as mandibles, as seems to be the case in Ceraurus.
_Thorax._
The thorax of _Neolenus_ consists of seven segments, and the appendages are well shown (pl. 17, fig. 1; pl. 18, figs. 1, 2; pl. 20, fig. 1.), The endopodites of successive segments vary but little, all are slender but compact, and consist of a long c.o.xopodite with six short, rather broad segments beyond it. In the figures, the endopodites extend some distance in a horizontal direction beyond the edges of the dorsal test, as many as four segments being in some cases visible, but measurements show that the appendages tended to fall outward on decay of the animal. The dactylopodites are provided with terminal spines as in _Triarthrus_. The c.o.xopodites are long, straight, and slender. They are well shown on only one specimen (pl.
18), where they are seen to be as wide as the basipodite, and the endobases are set with spines on the posterior and inner margins. They are so long that those on opposite sides must have almost met on the median line. The segments of the endopodites are mostly but little, if any, longer than broad, and at the distal end each shows two or more spines. The propodite and dactylopodite are notably more slender than the others. The exopodites of the thorax are broad and flat, and each shaft has two distinct parts with different kinds of setae. The posterior edge of the proximal lobe is fringed with a slender, flat, overlapping hairs which are a little longer than the width of the lobe, and stand at an angle of about 60 degrees with the direction of the axis of the appendage. The outer lobe is at an angle with the main one, and has short, very fine setae oh the margin. One or two specimens show some evidence of a joint between the inner and outer lobes, but in the great majority of cases they seem to be continuous; if originally in two segments, they have become firmly united. The exopodites of the thorax, like those of the cephalon, are directed diagonally forward and outward. (pl. 21, fig. 6; pl. 22.)
_Pygidium._
The pygidium of _Neolenus serratus_ is large, and usually shows five rings on the axial lobe and four pairs of ribs on the sides. There are five pairs of biramous appendages belonging to this s.h.i.+eld, and behind these a pair of jointed cerci. That the number of abdominal appendages should correspond to the number of divisions of the axial lobe rather than to the number of ribs on the pleural lobes is of interest, and in accord with other trilobites, as first shown by Beecher.
The endopodites of the pygidium have the same form as those of the thorax, are long, and very much less modified than those of any other trilobite whose appendages are known. On some specimens, they extend out far beyond the dorsal test, so that nearly all the segments are visible (pl. 17, fig. 3; pl. 18; pl. 19; pl. 20, fig. 1), but in these cases are probably displaced. The segments are short and wide, the whole endopodite tapering gradually outward. The dactylopodite bears terminal spines, and the individual segments also have outward-directed spines.
The cerci appear to have been long, slender, very spinose organs much like the antennules, but stiff rather than flexible. They are a little longer than the pygidium (pl. 17, figs. 1, 2), and seem to be attached to a plate on the under surface of the posterior end and in front of the very narrow doublure. The precise form of this attachment can not be determined from the published figures. They bear numerous fine spines (pl. 17, fig. 3).
_Epipodites and Exiles._
Doctor Walcott has found on several specimens of _Neolenus_ remains of organs which he interprets as epipodites and exites attached to the c.o.xopodites. A study of the specimens has, however, convinced me that both the large and small epipodites are really exopodites, and that the exites are badly preserved and displaced c.o.xopodites. Detailed explanation of this interpretation is given below in the description of the several specimens involved.
_Description of Individual Specimens._
Doctor Walcott was kind enough to send me eight of the more important specimens of _Neolenus_ figured by him, and since my interpretation of them does not agree in all respects with his, I have thought it fairer to the reader to present here rather full notes explaining the position I have taken. I understand that since I communicated my interpretation of the epipodites and exites to him, Doctor Walcott has submitted the specimens to several palaeontologists, who consider that epipodites are really present. Since I am not able to convince myself that their conclusion is based upon sound evidence, I give here my own interpretation. There is of course, no a priori reason why trilobites should not have had epipodites.
Specimen No. 58589.
Ill.u.s.trated: Walcott, Smithson. Misc. Coll., vol. 57, 1912, pl. 45, fig. 2;--Zittel-Eastman Text-book of Paleontology, vol. 1, 1913, fig. 1377;--Smithson. Misc. Coll., vol. 67, 1918, pl. 18, fig. 1; pl. 20, fig. 1.
This is one of the most important of the specimens, as it shows the c.o.xopodites of three thoracic limbs and the well preserved endopodites of six thoracic and five pairs of pygidial appendages.
The appendages are all s.h.i.+fted to the left till the articular socket of the c.o.xopodite is about 8 mm. outside of its proper position. The endopodites extend a corresponding amount beyond the edge of the dorsal test and are there so flattened that they are revealed as a mere impression. The c.o.xopodites, which are beneath the test, seem to have been somewhat protected by it, and while hopelessly crushed, are not flattened, but rather conformed to the ridges and grooves of the thorax.
[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 2. _Neolenus serratus_ (Rominger). A sketch of the c.o.xopodites and endopodites of two thoracic segments. Note notch for the reception of the lower end of the appendifer. 3.]
The c.o.xopodite of the appendage of the last thoracic segment is best preserved. It is rectangular, about one third as wide as long, with a slight notch in the posterior margin near the outer end. The inner end is obliquely truncated and shows about ten sharp spines which do not appear to be articulated to the segment, but rather to be direct outgrowths from it. There are similar spines along the posterior margin, but only two or three of what was probably once a continuous series are now preserved. On the opposite margin of the c.o.xopodite from the slight depression mentioned above, there is a slight convexity in the outline, which is better shown and explained by the c.o.xopodite just in front of this. That basal segment has the same form as the one just described, but as its posterior margin is for the greater part of its length pushed under the one behind it, the spines are not shown. On the posterior margin, two-thirds of the length from the proximal end, there is a shallow notch, and corresponding to it, a bulge on the anterior side. From a.n.a.logy with Ceraurus and _Calymene_ it becomes plain that the notch and bulge represent the position of the socket where the c.o.xopodite articulated with the appendifer. Since these structures have not been shown in previous ill.u.s.trations, a drawing giving my interpretation of them is here inserted (fig. 2).
It is evident from the position of the notch that the row of spines was on the dorsal (inner) side of the c.o.xopodite and that the truncation was obliquely downward and outward.
The endopodite of the last thoracic appendage is well preserved and may be described as typical of such a leg in this part. The basipodite is as wide as the c.o.xopodite, and it and the three succeeding segments, ischiopodite, meropodite, and carpopodite, are all parallel-sided, not expanded at the joints, and decrease regularly in width. The propodite and dactylopodite are also parallel-sided, but more slender than the inner segments, and on the end of the dactylopodite there are four little spines, three of them--one large and two small--articulated at the distal end, and the fourth projecting from the posterior outer angle. Each segment has one or more spines on the outer articular end, and the ischiopodite has several directed obliquely outward on the posterior margin. All of the four proximal segments show a low ridge parallel to and near the anterior margin, and several endopodites of the pygidium have a similar ridge and a row of spines along the posterior margin of some of the segments. These features indicate that the segments in question were not cylindrical in life, but compressed. From the almost universal location of the spines on the posterior side of the limbs as preserved, it seems probable that in the natural position the segments were held in a plane at a high angle with the horizontal, the ridge was dorsal and anterior and the row of spines ventral and posterior.
Because the spines on the endobases are dorsal it does not follow that those on the endopodites were, for the position of the c.o.xopodite in a crushed specimen does not indicate the position of the endopodite of even the same appendage.
The endopodites of the pygidium are similar to the one just described, except that some of them have spines on the posterior margin of the segments, and a few on the right side have extremely fine, faintly visible spines on the anterior side. The specimen shows fragments of a few exopodites, but nothing worth describing. In the middle of the right pleural lobe there is a small organ which Walcott has interpreted as a small epipodite. It is oval in form, broken at the end toward the axial lobe, and has exceedingly minute short setae on the posterior margin. From a.n.a.logy with other specimens, it appears to me to be the outer end of an exopodite.
_Measurements:_ The entire specimen is about 64 mm. long and 52 mm. wide at the genal angles. The thorax is about 41 mm. wide (disregarding the spines) at the seventh segment, and the axial lobe about 13 mm. wide at the same horizon. The measurements of the individual segments of the seventh left thoracic limb are:
c.o.xopodite, 9 mm. long, 3 mm. wide, the middle of the notch 8 mm.
from the inner end, measured along the bottom, and 6 mm. measured along the top.
Basipodite, 5 mm. long, 3 mm. wide Ischiopodite, 4 " " 3 " "
Meropodite, 3.5 " " 2.5 " "
Carpopodite, 3.5 " " 2 " "
Propodite, 3 " " 1.25 " "
Dactylopodite, 2 " " 1.25 " "
The five distal segments of the last pygidial endopodite are together 10.5 mm. long. The whole six segments of the endopodite of the third thoracic segments are together 21 mm. long. The distance from the appendifer of the third segment to the outer end of the spine is 17 mm. From the center of the notch in the c.o.xopodite to the outer end is 1.5 mm., which, added to the length of the endopodite, 21 mm., makes a distance of 22.5 mm. from the appendifer to the tip of the dactylopodite, showing that if projected straight outward, the endopodites of the thorax would project 5.5 mm. beyond the test, including spines.
The distance across the axial lobe from appendifer to appendifer on the seventh thoracic segment is 12.5 mm. Measured along the top of the c.o.xopodite, it is 6 mm. from the middle of the notch to the inner end, and measured along the bottom it is 8 mm. From the truncated form of the ends it is evident that the c.o.xopodites extended inward and downward from the appendifers, and with the dimensions given above, the inner toothed ends would practically meet on the median line.
Measurements on the appendages of the pygidia show that on this specimen they extend back about twice as far beyond the edge of the pygidium as they should, all being displaced.
Specimen No. 65514.
Ill.u.s.trated: Walcott, Smithson. Misc. Coll., vol. 67, 1918, pl. 19, figs. 1-3.
This specimen is so twisted apart that it is not possible to determine to what segments the appendages belong, but it exhibits the best preserved exopodites I have seen. The best one is just in front of the pygidium on the matrix, and shows a form more easily seen than described (our fig. 3). There is a broad, flat, leaf-like shaft, the anterior side of which follows a smooth curve, while in the curve on the posterior side, which is convex backward, there is a re-entrant, setting off a small outer lobe whose length is about one third the length of the whole. This lobe seems to be a continuation of the shaft, and the test of the whole is wrinkled and evidently very thin.
The main and distal lobes of the shaft both bear numerous delicate setae, but those of the outer lobe are much shorter and finer than those on the main portion. The latter are flattened and blade-like.
[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 3. Exopodite of _Neolenus serratus_ (Rominger), to show form of the lobes of the shaft, and the setae. 4.]
[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 4. _Neolenus serratus_ (Rominger). One of the so-called epipodites of specimen 65515, showing that it has the same outline as an exopodite (compare figure 3) and fragments of setae on the margin. 3.]
The anterior edge of the shaft shows a narrow stiffening ridge and the setae are but little longer than its greatest width. The second segment of the pygidium has another exopodite like this one, but shows faintly the line between the two lobes, as though there were two segments.
This specimen also shows some very well preserved endopodites, but they differ in no way from those described from specimen No. 58589.
Walcott mentions two large epipodites projecting from beneath the exopodites. I judge that he has reference to the distal lobes of the exopodites, but as these are continuous with the main shaft, there can be no other interpretation of them than that which I have given above.
_Measurements:_ The pygidium is 19 mm. long (without the spines) and about 34 mm. wide at the front. The exopodites show faintly beneath the pygidial s.h.i.+eld, but their proximal ends are too indistinct to allow accurate measurement. Apparently they were just about long enough to reach to the margin of the s.h.i.+eld. The best preserved one, that of the second segment in the pygidium, is about 11 mm. long, 2.5 mm. wide at the widest; the distal lobe is 2.5 mm. long, and the longest setae of the main lobe 3.5 mm. long. The pleural lobe of the pygidium is just 11 mm. wide at this point.
The endopodites project from 8 to 12 mm. beyond the pygidium, showing about four segments.
The thoracic exopodite described above is 11 mm. long and 2.75 mm.
wide at the widest part. The distal lobe is 3.5 mm. long and 2.25 mm.
wide, and the longest setae on the main lobe 3 mm. long.
Specimen No. 65519.
Ill.u.s.trated: Walcott, Zittel-Eastman Text-book of Paleontology, vol. 1, 1913, fig. 1343;--Smithson. Misc. Coll., vol. 67, 1918, pl. 21, fig. 6.
This specimen is somewhat difficult to study but is very valuable as showing the natural position of the exopodites of the anterior part of the thorax. Walcott's figures are excellent and show the broad leaf-like shafts, the distal lobes with the re-entrant angles in the posterior margin, and the long fine setae of the main lobes. None of the distal lobes retains its setae. All extend back to the dorsal furrows, but the proximal ends are not actually shown.
The specimen is especially important because it shows the same distal lobes as specimen No. 65514, and demonstrates that they are a part of the exopodite and not of any other structure.
_Measurements:_ The exopodite belonging to the fourth thoracic segment is 23 mm. long and 4 mm. wide at the widest part. The longest setae are 7 mm. in length.
Specimen No. 65520.
Ill.u.s.trated: Walcott, Smithson. Misc. Coll., vol. 67, 1918, pl. 20, fig. 2; pl. 22, fig. 1.
This is a practically entire specimen, on two blocks, one showing the interior of the sh.e.l.l, and the other the one figured by Walcott, a cast of the interior. The first shows the low rounded appendifers at the anterior angle of each axial tergite. They are almost entirely beneath the dorsal furrows and do not project so far into the axial lobe as those of Ceraurus and _Calymene_. In fact, only those at the anterior end of the thorax project inward at all. As expected, there are five pairs on the pygidium. The cephalon is unfortunately so exfoliated that the appendifers there are not preserved. The doublure of the pygidium is extremely narrow.