The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation - BestLightNovel.com
You’re reading novel The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation Part 160 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
[181] Capital Trust Co. _v._ Calhoun, 250 U.S. 208 (1919).
[182] Frisbie _v._ United States, 157 U.S. 160 (1895); _see also_ Margolin _v._ United States, 269 U.S. 93 (1925); Hines _v._ Lowrey, 305 U.S. 85 (1938).
[183] Wickard _v._ Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942).
[184] n.o.ble _v._ Union River Logging R. Co., 147 U.S. 165 (1893).
[185] Danzer Co. _v._ Gulf & S.I.R. Co., 268 U.S. 633 (1925).
[186] Lynch _v._ United States, 292 U.S. 571, 579 (1934). _See also_ Perry _v._ United States, 294 U.S. 330 (1935).
[187] Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank _v._ Radford, 295 U.S. 555 (1935).
[188] Wright _v._ Mountain Trust Co., 300 U.S. 440 (1937).
[189] Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. _v._ Chicago R.I. & P.R. Co., 294 U.S. 648 (1935).
[190] Kuehner _v._ Irving Trust Co., 299 U.S. 445 (1937).
[191] Re 620 Church Street Bldg. Corp., 299 U.S. 24 (1936).
[192] Lynch _v._ United States, 292 U.S. 571, 581 (1934).
[193] Dodge _v._ Osborn, 240 U.S. 118 (1916).
[194] Graham _v._ Goodcell, 228 U.S. 409 (1931).
[195] Anniston Mfg. Co. _v._ Davis, 301 U.S. 337 (1937).
[196] United States _v._ Heinszen & Co., 206 U.S. 370, 386 (1907).
[197] United States _v._ New York & C. Mail S.S. Co., 269 U.S. 304 (1925).
[198] United States _v._ Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938); Carolene Products Co. _v._ United States, 323 U.S. 18 (1944).
[199] Kentucky Whip Collar Co. _v._ Illinois C.R. Co., 299 U.S. 334 (1937).
[200] Virginian R. Co. _v._ System Federation, 300 U.S. 515, 559 (1937); National Labor Relations Board _v._ Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1 (1937).
[201] National Labor Relations Board _v._ Stowe Spinning Co., 336 U.S.
226 (1949).
[202] National Labor Relations Board _v._ Mackay Co., 304 U.S. 333 (1938).
[203] Woods _v._ Miller, 333 U.S. 138, 146 (1948). _See also_ Bowles _v._ Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 (1944).
[204] Ex parte Jackson, 96 U.S. 727 (1878).
[205] Public Clearing House _v._ Coyne, 194 U.S. 497 (1904); sustained in Donaldson _v._ Read Magazine, 333 U.S. 178 (1948).
[206] 194 U.S. 497, 505-506.
[207] American School of Magnetic Healing _v._ McAnnulty, 187 U.S. 94 (1902).
[208] United States ex rel. Milwaukee Social Democratic Pub. Co. _v._ Burleson, 255 U.S. 407 (1921).
[209] St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. _v._ United States, 298 U.S. 38 (1936); Denver Union Stock Yards Co. _v._ United States, 304 U.S. 470 (1938).
[210] 320 U.S. 591 (1944). The result of this case had been foreshadowed by the opinion of Justice Stone in Federal Power Commission _v._ Natural Gas Pipeline Co., 315 U.S. 575, 586 (1942) to the effect that the Commission was not bound to the use of any single formula or combination of formulas in determining rates.
[211] 320 U.S. 591, 602, 605 (1944).
[212] American Telephone & Telegraph Co. _v._ United States, 299 U.S.
232 (1936); United States _v._ New York Telephone Co., 326 U.S. 638 (1946); Northwestern Electric Co. _v._ Federal Power Commission, 321 U.S. 119 (1944).
[213] Valvoline Oil Co. _v._ United States, 308 U.S. 141 (1939); Champlin Refining Co. _v._ United States, 329 U.S. 29 (1946).
[214] Isbrandtsen-Moller Co. _v._ United States, 300 U.S. 139, 146 (1937).
[215] St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. _v._ United States, 245 U.S. 136, 143 (1917).
[216] Akron C. & Y.R. Co. _v._ United States, 261 U.S. 184 (1923).
[217] Dayton-Goose Creek R. Co. _v._ United States, 263 U.S. 456, 481, 483 (1924).
[218] Chicago, I. & L.R. Co. _v._ United States, 270 U.S. 287 (1926).
_Cf._ Seaboard Air Line R. Co. _v._ United States, 254 U.S. 57 (1920).
[219] United States _v._ Berwind-White Coal Mine Co., 274 U.S. 564, 575 (1927).
[220] United States ex rel. Attorney General _v._ Delaware & Hudson Co., 213 U.S. 366, 405, 411, 415 (1909).
[221] United States _v._ Lowden, 308 U.S. 225 (1939).
[222] Louisville & N.R. Co. _v._ Mottley, 219 U.S. 467 (1911).
[223] Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co. _v._ United States, 284 U.S. 80 (1931).
[224] Railroad Retirement Board _v._ Alton R. Co., 295 U.S. 330 (1935).
[225] United States _v._ Bennett, 232 U.S. 299, 307 (1914).
[226] Cook _v._ Tait, 265 U.S. 47 (1924).
[227] Helvering _v._ Lerner Stores Corp., 314 U.S. 463, 468 (1941).
[228] Brushaber _v._ Union P.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, 24 (1916).
