Expositions of Holy Scripture Volume III Part 49

THE RAY AND THE REFLECTION

'We love Him, because He first loved us.'--1 John iv. 19.

Very simple words! but they go down into the depths of G.o.d, lifting burdens off the heart of humanity, turning duty into delight, and changing the aspect of all things. He who knows that G.o.d loves him needs little more for blessedness; he who loves G.o.d back again offers more than all burnt offering and sacrifices. But it is to be observed that the correct reading of my text, as you will find in the Revised Version, omits 'Him' in the first clause, and simply says 'we love,' without specifying the object. That is to say, for the moment John's thought is fixed rather on the inward transformation effected, from self-regard to love--than on considering the object on which the love is expended. When the heart is melted, the streams flow wherever there is a channel. The river, as he goes on to show us, parts into two heads, and love to G.o.d and love to man are, in their essence and root-principle, one thing.

So my text is the summary of all revelation about G.o.d, the ultimate word about all our relations to Him, and the all-inclusive directory as to our conduct to one another. To know that G.o.d loves, and to love again--there is a little pocket encyclopaedia in two volumes, which contains the smelted-down essence of all theology and of all morality.

Let us look at these three points.

I. The ultimate word about G.o.d.

'He first loved us.' Properly and strictly speaking, that 'first' only declares the priority of the divine love towards us over ours towards Him. But we may fairly give it a wider meaning, and say--first of all, ere Creation and Time, away back in the abysmal depths of an everlasting and changeless heart, changeless in the sense that its love was eternal, but not changeless in the sense that love could have no place within it--first of all things was G.o.d's love; last to be discovered because most ancient of all. The foundation is disclosed last when you come to dig, and the essence is grasped last in the process of a.n.a.lysis.

So one of the old psalms, with wondrous depth of truth, traces up everything to this, 'For His mercy endureth for ever.' Therefore, there was time; therefore, there were creatures--'He made great lights, for His mercy endureth for ever.' Therefore, there were judgments--'He slew famous kings ... for His mercy endureth for ever.' And so we may pa.s.s through all the works of the divine energy, and say, 'He first loved us.'

It is no accident that there are but foregleams of this great thought brightening the words and the thoughts of psalmist and prophet, saint and sage, from the beginning onwards, while the articulate utterance of the simple sentence was first heard from the lips of Him who declared the Father, and stands in that part of the Book which, both in its position there, and in its date of composition is the last of the Apostolic utterances. 'G.o.d is love';--that is in one aspect the foundation of His being, and in another aspect the s.h.i.+ning ruby set on the very sky-piercing summit of the completed process of the revelation of that Being to man. 'He first loved us'; and thence, from that centre and germinal point, streams out the whole train of consequences in the divine activity, and in the divine self-revelation.

I need not ask you to contrast with this infinitely simple and infinitely deep utterance all other thoughts of a divine Being--the cold abstractions of Theism, the dim dreads of popular apprehension, the vague utterances of any mythology, the clouds that men's thoughts have covered over the face of this great truth--and then, to set by the side of all these groping, these peradventures, these fears, these narrow, unworthy ideas, the clear simplicity, the infinite depth of 'He first loved us.'

But I may ask you to consider, but for a moment, the relation which all the other perfection of the divine nature have to this central and foundation one. There are all those pompous names, 'Omnipresence' and 'Omniscience' and the like, which are but the negations of the limitations of humanity or of finite creatures. There are the more spiritual and moral thoughts of Wisdom and Righteousness and the like.

These are but the fringes of the glory: I was going to venture to say that the divinest thing in G.o.d is love. There is the central blaze; the rest is but the brilliant periphery that encloses it. And that infinite love stands to all these other attributes in the relation of being their master and motive spring. They are Love's instrument, and in the divine nature Love is Lord of all. They give it majesty; it gives them tenderness. We may reverently say, in regard to the divine nature, what the Apostle says about our humanity, that love is the 'bond of perfectness'--the girdle which, braced round all the garments, keeps them in their place. For round these infinite, innumerable, unnameable, and named divine perfections, is that which brings them all into symmetry and keeps them all in harmonious action--Love. He has wisdom, and power, and eternal being, but He is Love.

But do not let us forget that whilst thus my text proclaims the ultimate truth, these other attributes, as they are called, are all smelted down, as it were, into, and present in, the love which is their crown. The same Apostle, who has thus the honour of ringing out to the world the good news that G.o.d is Love, declares that 'this is the message' which he has to tell, that 'G.o.d is light, and in Him is no darkness at all.' So the light of righteousness, as well as the lambent flame of love, burn together on that central fire of the universe. We must not so conceive of the love of G.o.d, as to darken the radiance of His righteousness, or to obscure the brilliancy of that pure light which tolerates no admixture of darkness.

May I venture a step further, and ask whether we are not warranted in believing that in that which we call the love of G.o.d there do abide the same elements as characterise the thing that bears the same name in our human experience? The spectrum has told us that the const.i.tuents of the mighty sun in the heavens are the same as the const.i.tuents of this little darkened earth. And there are the same lines in the divine spectrum that there are in ours. So if we can venture to say of Him, He is Love, do not let us shrink from saying that then, like us, He delights in the companions.h.i.+p of His beloved; that, like us, He rejoices in giving Himself to His beloved; that, like us, but infinitely, He desires the good of His beloved; and that, like us, He seeks only for the requital of an answering love. All these things, the joy of the Lord in man, the yielding of the Lord to man, the beneficent desire of the Lord for the good of man, and the hunger of the Lord for the response of love from man--all these things are affirmed when we affirm that G.o.d is Love.

Our Apostle would concur heartily in the great text which was the theme of a recent sermon. Paul said, 'G.o.d establishes His love towards us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.' John says, 'Herein is love, not that we loved G.o.d, but that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.'

So the Cross of Christ is the one demonstration that G.o.d loved us.

Looking to it we can say, with a great modern teacher:--

'So the All-great were the All-loving too, So through the thunder comes a human voice, Saying "Oh! heart I made; a heart beats here, Face, My hands fas.h.i.+oned, see it in Myself; Thou hast no power, nor mayest conceive of Mine; But love I gave thee, with Myself to love, And thou must love Me, who have died for thee."'

II. Here we have the ultimate word as to our religion.

'We love Him, because He first loved us.' There is a bridge wanted between these two, and the bridge is supplied abundantly in this letter, in entire harmony with the teaching of the rest of the New Testament.

Much has been said, and profitably said, with reference to the modification of the general type of Christian teaching in the writings respectively of Paul, Peter, James, and John. I thankfully recognise the diversities. They are not divergencies; they are perfectly complementary, and may all be made to harmonise. This Apostle of love has also declared to us how it comes that the love which burns at the centre of things, where there is a heart, kindles a responding love away out on the circ.u.mference of things, where there are men with hearts; and the bridge is--'We have known and believed the love that G.o.d hath to us.' So says John. And Paul, the Apostle of faith, who sometimes seems as if his only conception of the link of union between G.o.d and man was, on the part of man, faith, responds when he speaks of a faith which worketh, comes to energetic operation, through the love which it has kindled.

So we come to this, that a simple trust in the love of G.o.d, as manifested in Jesus Christ, our Lord, is the only thing which will so deal with man's natural self-regard and desire to make himself his own object and centre, as to subst.i.tute for that the victorious love to G.o.d.

You cannot love G.o.d, unless you believe that He loves you. You will never be absolutely sure of that, unless you have learned it from the Cross of Christ. You will not respond with the love that He desires, but there will be a film between your ice and the fire that could melt it, until that is swept away by the simple act of confidence in G.o.d manifested to you in Jesus Christ. This is Christianity; this, nothing less, is religion--to love G.o.d, because I believe that in Jesus Christ G.o.d has loved me.

And that is the only thing that He desires or accepts. The Religion of Fear; what is it? 'Thou wert an austere man ... and I was afraid.' Yes!

and what did you do when you were afraid? 'I hid my talent in the ground,' and was utterly idle. Here rise, on either side of the valley, two mountains--Ebal and Gerazim. From the one were thundered the curses, from the other broke the benediction of the blessings; the one is barren, the other is verdant--'which thing is an allegory.' The Religion of Fear does nothing, the Religion of Love does all. The Religion of Self-interest is narrow, poor, mostly inoperative of any lofty enthusiasm or high n.o.bleness of character. The Religion of Duty; 'I ought to wors.h.i.+p, I am bidden to do this, that, or the other thing, which I do not a bit like to do. I am forbidden to do this, that, and the other thing which I should very much like to do, if I durst'--that religion is the religion of a slave; and there are hosts of us that know nothing better. And so our Christianity is a feeble and an uncomfortable thing; and there are little joy, and little subjugation of the will, and little leaping up of the heart in glad obedience in it. I was talking to a good, aged man, not long ago, whose religion was of a very gloomy type. He said to me, 'As to love, I know next to nothing about it.' Ah!

brethren, I am afraid that is true about a good many of us who call ourselves Christians.

Then let me say, too, that if we love Him, it will be the motive power and spring of all manner of obediences and glad services. Love is the mother-tincture, so to speak, which you can colour, and to which you can add in various ways, and produce variously tinted and tasted and perfumed commixtures. Love lies at the foundation of all Christian goodness. It will lead to the subjugation of the will; and that is the thing that is most of all needed to make a man righteous and pure. So St. Augustine's paradox, rightly understood, is a magnificent truth, 'Love! and do what you will.' For then you will be sure to will what G.o.d wills, and you ought.

If this be the summing-up of all religion, a practical conclusion follows. When we feel ourselves defective in the glow and operative driving power of love to G.o.d, what is the right thing to do? When a man is cold, he will not warm himself by putting a clinical thermometer into his mouth, and taking his temperature, will he? Let him go into the suns.h.i.+ne and he will be warmed up. You can pound ice in a mortar, and except for the little heat generated by the impact of the pestle, it will keep ice still. But float the iceberg south into the tropics, and what has become of it? It has all run down into sweet, warm water, and mingled with the warm ocean that has dissolved it. So do not think about yourselves and your own loveless hearts so much, but think about G.o.d, and the infinite welling up of love in His heart to you, a great deal more. 'We love Him, because He first loved us'; therefore, to love Him more, we must feel more that He does love us.

III. Lastly, here is the ultimate word about our conduct to men.

I said that John, by leaving out any specification of the object of love, as well as by the verses that immediately follow, shows that he regards the emotion as one, though its direction is two-fold. That just comes to the plain truth, that the only victorious antagonist to the self-regarding temperament of average men, and the only power which will change philanthropy from a sentiment into a self-denying and active principle of conduct, is to be found in the belief of the love of G.o.d in Jesus Christ, and in answering love to Him.

That is a lesson for many sorts of people to-day. What they call altruism is no discovery of Christianity, but its practice is. I freely admit that there is much honest and self-sacrificing beneficence and benevolence which are not connected, in the men who practice them, with faith in Jesus Christ. But I question very much whether these would have existed if the story of the Cross had been unknown. And sure I am that the history of non-Christian attempts to promote the brotherhood of man, and to diffuse a wide and operative love of mankind, teaches us, on the one side, that the emotion is not strong enough to last, and to work, unless it is based on G.o.d's love in Jesus Christ. And the history of Christianity, on the other side, though with many defects and things to be ashamed of, teaches us, conversely, that wherever there is a genuine love of G.o.d, its exterior form, so to say, the outside of it which is presented to the world, will be true love to man.

Christian people, lay this to heart; you are to be mirrors of the love to which you turn for all blessedness and peace. It is of no use to say, 'My religion is the love of G.o.d' unless the love of G.o.d is manifested in the love of man. If you love G.o.d, you will love those that G.o.d loves, those for whom Christ died, those who are just like what _you_ were when you learned that G.o.d loved you. The service of G.o.d is the service of man.

One last word, 'We love Him, because He first loved us.' Do you? Or is it rather true of you: 'I do not love G.o.d, though He has loved me'? I saw not long since, up on the flank of a mountain, an obstinate patch of snow, that had fronted, in unmelted cold, months of the summer sun.

There are some of us who lift a broad s.h.i.+eld of thick-ribbed ice between ourselves and the radiance of the warm heart of G.o.d. Oh! brother; do not shut that love out of your heart; for if you do, you shut out peace and goodness, and shut in all manner of poisonous creatures and doleful shapes, whose companions.h.i.+p will be misery and death.

Transcriber's note:

List of corrections and amendments made:

Ephesians:

Page 36: added closing quote after "the event of our inheritance"

(line 3) 102: "gentle words _ot_" to "_to_"

154: "it" added in "what it is to hear"

263: [Preached on Whitsunday] was a footnote.

286: (R.V.) to (R.V.). for consistency with other references.

286: "please _to_ understand" to "_do"

287: "we _shoud_ be ent.i.tled" to "should"

391: added -- and changed Ephes. to Eph. for consistency with other headings 391: added colon after "Mark its simplicity" (for grammar, and there was a large s.p.a.ce in the book)

Peter and John:

8: "_ordisaster_" to "_or disaster_"

28: added close quote after "that which is another's"

34: added close quote after "My heavenly Father's Kingdom."

39: "to _y_" -> "to you" in poetry 66: added -- after "especially to recreation" (for sense, and there was a large s.p.a.ce in the book) 86: "_Caesarae_ Philippi" to "_Caesarea_ Philippi"

88: "bow _or_ stubborn" to "bow _our_ stubborn"

99: "dicattes" to "dictates"

107: "ever" to "even" in quotation from 1 Peter ii. 21 116: added opening quote before "Any man who"

146: "inadeqate" to "inadequate"

170: "It may be that he he". Duplicate word deleted 173: "_Whose_ righteousness clothes" to "_whose_"

210: added open quote before sea of gla.s.s (by reference to Rev 15:2) 219: "slave has no _resource_" -> "_recourse_"

219: added opening quote before "Take that man's child"