Life of Thomas a Becket - BestLightNovel.com
You’re reading novel Life of Thomas a Becket Part 9 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
[178] Epist. Giles, iii. 262; Bouquet, 199.
[179] Epist. ibid.; Radulph de Diceto.
[180] According to Pope Alexander, Henry offered that his son should give the kiss of peace in his stead.--Giles, iv. 55.
[181] See his letter to his emissaries at Rome.--Giles, iii. 219; Bouquet, 401.
[182] Ricardus Dorubernensis apud Twysden. Lord Lyttelton has another copy, in his appendix; in that a ninth article forbade the payment of Peter's Pence to Rome; it was to be collected and brought into the exchequer.
[183] Epist. Giles, iii. 195; Bouquet, 404.
[184] Giles, iii. 192; Bouquet, 405.
[185] Dated February 12, 1170.
[186] Epist. Giles, iii. 96; Bouquet, 416; Giles, iii. 108; Bouquet, 419. "Sed pro ea mori parati sumus." He adds: "Insurgant qui voluerint cardinales, arment non modo regem Angliae, sed totum, si possent orbem in perniciem nostram.... Utinam via Romana non gratis peremisset tot miseros innocentes. Quis de cetero audebit illi regi registere quem ecclesia Romana tot triumphis animavit, et armavit exemplo pernitioso manante ad posteros."
[187] "Nec persuadebitur mundo, quod suasores isti Deum saperent; sed potius pecuniam, quam immoderato avaritiae ardore sitiunt, olfecerunt."--Giles, iv. 291; Bouquet, 417.
[188] Becket's depression at this event is dwelt upon in a letter of Peter of Blois to John of Salisbury. Peter traveled from Rome to Bologna with the Papal legates. From them he gathered that either Becket would soon be reconciled to the King or be removed to another patriarchate.--Epist. xxii. apud Giles, i. p. 84.
[189] Dr. Lingard holds this letter, printed by Lord Lyttelton, and which he admits was produced, to have been a forgery. If it was, it was a most audacious one; and a most flagrant insult to the Pope, whom Henry was even now endeavoring to propitiate through the Lombard Republics and the Emperor of the East (see Giles, iv. 10). It is remarkable, too, that though the Pope declares that this coronation, contrary to his prohibition (Giles, iv. 30), is not to be taken as a precedent, he has no word of the forgery. Nor do I find any contemporary a.s.sertion of its spuriousness. Becket, indeed, in his account of the last interview with the King, only mentions the general permission granted by the Pope at an early period of the reign; and argues as if this were the only permission. Is it possible that a special permission to York to act was craftily interpolated into the general permission? But the trick may have been on the side of the Pope, now granting, now nullifying his own grants by inhibition. Bouquet is strong against Baronius (as on other points) upon Alexander's duplicity.--p. 434.
[190] Giles, iii. 229.
[191] Giles, iii. 302.
[192] "Dictum fuit aliquem dixisse vel scripsisse regi Anglorum de Archepiscopo ut quid tenetur exclusus? melius tenebitur inclusus quam exclusus. Satisque dictum fuit intelligenti."--p. 272.
[193] Giles, iv. 30; Bouquet, 436.
[194] "Nam de consuetudinibus quas tanta pervicacia vindicare consueverat nec mutire praesumpsit." Becket was as mute. The issue of the quarrel seems entirely changed. The Const.i.tutions of Clarendon recede, the right of coronation occupies the chief place.--See the long letter, Giles, 65.
[195] Humbold Bishop of Ostia advised the confining the triumph to the depression of the Archbishop of York and the excommunication of the Bishops.--Giles, vi. 129; Bouquet, 443.
[196] "Licet ei (regi sc.) peperceritis, dissimulare non audetis excessus et crimina sacerdotum." This letter is a curious revelation of the arrogance and subtlety of Becket.--Giles, iii. 77.
[197] It is called the Pax.
[198] Becket disclaims vengeance: "Neque hoc dicimus, Deo teste, vindictam expetentes, quum scriptum esse noverimus, non quaeres ultionem ... sed ut ecclesia correctionis exemplo possit per Dei gratiam in posterum roborare, et poena paucorum multos aedificare."--Giles, iii. 76.
[199] See Becket's account.--Giles, iii. p. 81.
[200] Lambeth says: "Visum est autem nonnullis, quod incirc.u.mspecte literarum vindicta post pacem usus est, que _tantum pacis desperatione fuerint datae_"--p. 116. Compare pp. 119 and 152.
[201] Lord Lyttelton has drawn an inference from these words unfavorable to the purity of Idonea's former life; and certainly the examples of the Magdalene and the woman of Egypt, if this be not the case, were unhappily chosen.
[202] Fitz-Stephen, pp. 281, 284.
[203] Becket calls York his ancient enemy: "Lucifer ponens sedem suum in aquilone."
[204] Becket accuses the bishops of thirsting for his blood! "Let them drink it." But this was a phrase which he uses on all occasions, even to William of Pavia.
[205] "Si vero ita eidem Archiepiscopo et Cantuarensi Ecclesiae satisfacere inveniretis, ut poenam istam ipse videat relaxandam, vice nostra per illum volumus adimpleri."--Apud Bouquet, p. 461.
[206] "Ipse tamen Londonias adiens, et ibi missarum solenniis celebratis, quosdam excommunicavit."--Pa.s.sio, iii. p. 154.
[207] Since this pa.s.sage was written an excellent and elaborate paper has appeared in the Quarterly Review, full of local knowledge. I recognize the hand of a friend from whom great things may be expected. I find, I think, nothing in which we disagree, though that account, having more ample s.p.a.ce, is more particular than mine. (Reprinted in Memorials of Canterbury, by Rev. A. P. Stanley.)
[208] Fitz-Stephen, De Bosham, Grim, _in loc._
[209] See, on the former history of these knights, Quarterly Review, vol. xciii. p. 355. The writer has industriously traced out all that can be known, much which was rumored about these men.
[210] Tuesday, Dec. 29. See, on the fatality of Tuesday in Becket's life, Q. R. p. 357.
[211] Grim, p. 71. Fitz-Stephen.
[212] For the accurate local description, see Quarterly Review, p. 367.
[213] Grim, 70.
[214] John of Salisbury. Bouquet, 619, 620.
[215] Giles, iv. 162; Bouquet, 467. It was fitting that the day after that of the Holy Innocents should be that on which should rise up this new Herod.
[216] See the letter of Arnulf of Lisieux.--Bouquet, 469.
[217] The Quarterly reviewer has the merit of tracing out the extraordinary fate of the murderers. "By a singular reciprocity, the principle for which Becket had contended, that priests should not be subjected to the secular courts, prevented the trial of a layman for the murder of a priest by any other than a clerical tribunal." Legend imposes upon them dark and romantic acts of penance; history finds them in high places of trust and honor.--pp. 377, _et seqq._ I may add that John of Oxford five years after was Bishop of Norwich. Ridel too became of Ely.
[218] Diceto, p. 557.
[219] This stipulation, in Henry's view, canceled hardly any; as few, and these but trifling customs, had been admitted during his reign.
[220] The scene is related by all the monkish chroniclers.--Gervaise, Diceto, Brompton, Hoveden.
[221] Peter of Blois was a.s.sured by the two cardinal legates of Henry's innocence of Becket's death. See this letter, which contains a most high-flown eulogy on the transcendent virtues of Henry.--Epist. 66.
[222] On the effect of the death, and the immediate concourse of the people to Canterbury, Lambeth, p. 133.
[223] Herbert de Bosham, writing fourteen years after Becket's death, declares him among the most undisputed martyrs. "Quod alicujus martyrum causa justior fuit aut apertior ego nec audivi, nec legi." So completely were clerical immunities part and parcel of Christianity.
[224] The enemies of Becket a.s.signed base reasons for his opposition to the King. "Ecclesiasticam etiam libertatem, quam defensatis, non ad animarum lucrum sed ad augmentum pecuniarum, episcopos vestros intorquere." See the charges urged by John of Oxford.--Giles, iv. p.
188.
[225] Especially in Epist. 19. "Interim."
[226] It is not just to judge the clergy by the crimes of individual men, but there is one case, mentioned by no less an authority than John of Salisbury, too flagrant to pa.s.s over: it was in Becket's own cathedral city. Immediately after Becket's death the Bishops of Exeter and Worcester were commissioned by Pope Alexander to visit St.
Augustine's, Canterbury. They report the total dilapidation of the buildings and estates. The prior elect "Jugi, quod hereticus d.a.m.nat, fluit libidine, et hinnit in foeminas, adeo impudens ut libidinem, nisi quam publicaverit, voluptuosam esse non reputat." He debauched mothers and daughters: "Fornicationis abusum comparat necessitati." In one village he had seventeen b.a.s.t.a.r.ds.--Epist. 310.