Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Debate Index - BestLightNovel.com
You’re reading novel Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Debate Index Part 3 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
=Arbitration, Commercial.=
Askew, 1906, p. 15: Briefs.
=Arbitration, Compulsory industrial.=
Boards of arbitration with compulsory powers should be established to settle disputes between employers and wage-earners. Ringwalt, p. 210: Briefs and references.
Capital and labor should be compelled to settle their disputes in legally established courts of arbitration. Debaters' handbook ser., no.
1: Briefs, references, and selected articles.
Compulsory industrial arbitration. Askew, 1906, p. 16: Briefs and references.--Askew, 1911, p. 13: Briefs.
The government should settle all disputes between capital and labor.
Craig, p. 556: Outlines.
Ought arbitration in trade disputes to be enforced by law? Gibson, p.
24: Briefs and references.
State boards of arbitration with compulsory powers should be established throughout the United States to settle industrial disputes between employers and employees. Foster, p. 353: Speech (affirmative).
There should be a national board of arbitration for matters in dispute between employers and employees on inter-state railroads, and this board should be given compulsory powers. Brookings, p. 162: Briefs and references.
=Arbitration, International.=
Could not arbitration be made a subst.i.tute for war? Rowton, p. 224: References.
International arbitration; is it a subst.i.tute for war? Askew, 1906, p.
16: Briefs and references.--Askew, 1911, p. 14: Briefs.
The United States should form a treaty with Great Britain and with France agreeing to arbitrate all disputed questions. C. L. of P.
Reference lists.
=Arctic exploration.=
Has Arctic exploration been justified in its results? Matson, p. 412: Briefs and references.
=Aristocratic and democratic government.=
Askew, 1906, p. 17: Briefs and references.
=Aristotle and Plato.= _See_ =Plato and Aristotle.=
=Armaments.=
Danger of increased armaments. Askew, 1906, p. 114: Briefs and references.
Reduction of national armaments. Askew, 1911, p. 15: Briefs.
_See also_ Disarmament.
=Armed intervention.=
Armed intervention for the collection of debts. Speaker, v. 2, p. 391: Briefs and references.--C. L. of P. Debates: Briefs.
Armed intervention is not justifiable on the part of any nation to collect in behalf of private individuals financial claims against any American nation. Pearson, p. 223: Synopses and references.
=Armenian question.=
Armenian question and English intervention. Askew, 1906, p. 18: Briefs and references.
=Army= (England).
Army short service. Askew, 1906, p. 20: Briefs and references.--Askew, 1911, p. 16: Briefs.
Compulsory universal service. Askew, 1911, p. 207: Briefs.
_See also_ Conscription.
=Army= (United States). Increase.
Is it good government for the United States to maintain a standing army greater than is actually necessary to enforce the laws of the country?
Craig, p. 520: Speeches.
The United States army should be increased rather than diminished. C. L.
of P. Reference lists.
The United States army should be increased to one thousand for each million of our population. Thomas, p. 200: Briefs.
=Art.=
Should not all national works of art be entirely free to the public?
Rowton, p. 227: References.
=Art, British.=
Is British art declining? Gibson, p. 27: Briefs and references.
=Art and morality.=
Does art, in its principles and works, imply the moral? Is art amenable to an ethical standard? Matson, p. 365: Briefs and references.
=Art and religion.=
Is the influence of the fine arts favorable to religion? Matson, p. 366: Briefs and references.
=Art and science.=
Are art and science antagonistic? Is the general prevalence of natural science prejudicial to the cultivation of high art? Matson, p. 362: Briefs and references.