A Guide to Methods and Observation in History - BestLightNovel.com
You’re reading novel A Guide to Methods and Observation in History Part 2 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
13. Make a list of some of the modern textbooks on each of the following phases of history: (_a_) Ancient; (_b_) Mediaeval and Modern; (_c_) English; (_d_) French; (_e_) American; (_f_) Civil Government.
What would be your first and your second choices of texts in each of these six divisions, and why, specifically, would you make those choices?
14. What texts are used in the high schools you have observed?
15. What school authorities ought to select the texts to be used in the high school? 16. How far have your observations in the high school been in accord with your ideals and theories with respect to the kinds and uses of historical "material" of all kinds?
IV. _Conceptions of the Purpose and Content of History._[1]
1. As polite literature: the Greek and Roman idea, e.g., Herodotus, Thucydides, Xenophon, Livy, Sall.u.s.t, Caesar, Tacitus.
2. As annals and chronicles only: the Mediaeval idea, e.g., Gregory of Tours, Froissart, Einhard.
3. As a basis for governmental policies and as a means of interpreting literature: the Renaissance idea, e.g., Machiavelli, Petrarch, Boccaccio.
4. As a basis for theological dogma and religious practices: the Reformation idea, e.g., Luther, Melanchthon, and the Jesuits.
5. As a basis for interpreting legal inst.i.tutions and practices: the idea of the 17th century, e.g., the Jurists.
6. As a foundation for philosophical speculation and a means of discovering the deeper influences that affect humanity and hence influence action and produce events: the idea of the 18th century, e.g., Voltaire and Montesquieu. [Voltaire held that human nature is the same under all circ.u.mstances and at all times, and hence sought to judge historical events by abstract universal standards. The "natural man" was his ideal man. Montesquieu, in _The Spirit of the Laws_, sought to show that events in history are but the manifestation of spiritual law, as revealed in conditions of climate, geography, soil, natural resources, racial temperament, etc.]
7. As a foundation for personal reactions, e.g., criticisms, interpretation, moralizing, personal philosophizing, or as mere facts entertainingly told: the idea of the early 19th century.
8. History as science, i.e., as explanatory of existing social inst.i.tutions, customs, beliefs: the idea of the 20th century.
[1] The fundamental purpose of historical writing has ever been the recording of events. In addition, however, different ages have stressed other aims.
V. _Some Notable Influences and Persons that have modified the Conception of the Meaning of History in the Last Century._
1. Romantic School (late 18th century and early 19th century), with its deep reverence for the Middle Ages. Hence sympathetic treatment of history.
2. Herder (1744-1803), with his philosophy of "becoming" or development. Herder sought to show that all events are but the manifestation of a deity striving to work out an ideal universe. Hence all events must be judged by the standards of the time and country in which they appear, i.e., be judged by the characteristics of the age and people affected.
3. Hegel (1770-1831) carried the theory of Herder to more complete conclusions.
4. Niebuhr (1776-1831), "one of the most acute historical critics and philologists of modern times." Niebuhr was among the first to emphasize the need of a critical examination of source material, and of the building up the past out of these data.
5. Ranke, Leopold von (1795-1886). His aim was to set before the reader the entire picture of events "with their causes, relations, and consequences."
6. Guizot, Francois P. G. (1787-1874). His great influence was in extending the scope of history so as to include universal history, not merely national history, or the history of isolated and local events.
7. Carlyle (1795-1881), through his keen insight into character and his love of hero-wors.h.i.+p, introduced the vividly realistic and picturesque element.
8. Buckle (1821-1862) included economic forces in his studies and sought the spirit of history apart from particular men and events.
9. Macaulay (1800-1859) presented historical philosophy and the laws and theories of government in eloquent and fascinating style, thus bringing to the popular mind an interest that had heretofore been slight.
10. Froude (1818-1894), in charming literary style but with carelessness of detail, emphasized the personal element in history and set himself the ideal of "simply recording human actions without theorizing theron."
11. Stubbs (1825-1901) "introduced the critical study of mediaeval sources into England," employed exact methods of work, and gave impetus to const.i.tutional history.
12. Green (1837-1883) depicted the progress of the life of the people and dealt only incidentally with the political history of the state.
13. Schmoller (1838- ) emphasized the economic aspects of history.
VI. _History in the Curriculum._
1. Pre-Renaissance Period: Incidental historical study made in connection with the study of biography and literature.
2. Renaissance Period: Historical studies pursued as auxiliary to the interpretation of the cla.s.sics.
3. Post-Renaissance Period in Europe.
(_a_) Heraldry and local, contemporary historical incidents and events taught in Ritterakedemien after 1648.
(_b_) In Germany, the systematic study of history in schools really dates from about 1806, though an independent status was given history in the universities (particularly in Gottingen) in the 18th century.
(_c_) In France, historical study was introduced by Guizot (about 1833) but received no great attention until after 1860, though there was nominally a chair of history in the College de France after 1769.
(_d_) In England, none but incidental attention was given historical study until after the middle of the 19th century, though there was a professors.h.i.+p of ancient history at Oxford in 1622, and professors.h.i.+ps of modern history were found at both Oxford and Cambridge in 1724.
4. Historical Study in America.
(_a_) History was taught incidentally by professors of philosophy in most of the universities from their founding.
(_b_) Yale had a professors.h.i.+p of ecclesiastical history in 1778-1795.
(_c_) Harvard established the first professors.h.i.+p in history (in the general sense of the term) in 1839, Jared Sparks being the first inc.u.mbent.
(_d_) Columbia University and the University of Michigan established chairs of history in 1857.
(_e_) Yale established a chair of history in 1865.
(_f_) The first seminary in history was established at the University of Michigan in 1869 by Prof. C. K. Adams.
(_g_) General history and ancient history were found in normal schools after about 1850.
(_h_) In secondary schools (first in academies, then later in high schools) history was taught as a separate study from about 1830.