Mary Queen of Scots 1542-1587 - BestLightNovel.com
You’re reading novel Mary Queen of Scots 1542-1587 Part 31 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy
_Queen Mary at Jedburgh_, by John Small.
_Ill.u.s.trations of the Reign of Mary Queen of Scots._ (Maitland Club.)
_Relations Politiques de la France et de l'Espagne avec l'ecosse_, edited by Teulet.
_The Tragedy of Fotheringay_, by the Hon. Mrs. Maxwell-Scott.
These are the main authorities. A complete list of publications dealing with the question up to 1700, will be found in "A Bibliography of Works relating to Mary Queen of Scots, 1544-1700,"
by John Scott, C.B. (Edinburgh Bibliographical Society, 1896). Very full references will be found in Mr. Hay Fleming's notes. The list of authorities appended to the articles "Mary Stuart," in the _Dictionary of National Biography_, should also be consulted.
(E.) CONTROVERSIAL WORKS.
The general historians who deal with the period--Hume, Robertson, Tytler, Laing, Froude, and Hill Burton--are usually ranked among Queen Mary's opponents. Hume and Froude occupy the most decided position. Among other writers who are definitely against the theory of Mary's innocence, must be reckoned Mignet ("Life of Mary Queen of Scots"), Mr. D. Hay Fleming ("Mary Queen of Scots"), and Mr. T.
F. Henderson (articles, "Mary Stuart," "Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley," "James Hepburn, Earl of Bothwell," &c., in the _Dictionary of National Biography_). No one can hope to understand the present position of the controversy without the writings of Mr.
Fleming and Mr. Henderson. Among general controversialists on the side of Queen Mary, may be mentioned the works already quoted, by Walter Goodall, George Chalmers, and John Hosack, William Tytler's "Inquiry into the Evidence against Mary Queen of Scots" (1790), Whitaker's "Mary Queen of Scots Vindicated" (1778), Miss Agnes Strickland's "Lives of the Queens of Scotland," Mr. Alex. Walker's "Mary, Queen of Scots," Mr. M'Neel-Caird's "Mary Stuart," and Sir John Skelton's "Impeachment of Mary Stuart," "Maitland of Lethington," and "Life of Mary Stuart." Mr. Swinburne's "Mary Queen of Scots" is one of the most attractive works on the subject. The reader will recollect that the "false Duessa" in Spenser's "Faerie Queen" is the Queen of Scots.
The last few years have seen the publication of many important works dealing with the problem of the Casket Letters, _e.g._:--
Bresslau: "Die Ka.s.settenbriefe der Konigin Maria Stuart," in the _Historisches Taschenbuche_, 1882.
Sepp: _Die Ka.s.settenbriefe_, 1884.
Gerde: "Geschichte der Konigin Maria Stuart," 1885.
T. F. Henderson: "Casket Letters, and Mary Queen of Scots." 2nd ed.
1890.
Philippson: "Histoire du Regne de Marie Stuart," 1891-92.
The English reader will find the material in Mr. T. F. Henderson's work ample for his purpose. The preface to Mr. Hay Fleming's "Mary Queen, of Scots" promises a second volume, which will contain the life in captivity, and, of course, deal with the letters. No Marian apologist has, as yet, attempted an answer to the more recent evidence on the other side, and Hosack's great work is now considerably superseded. The foregoing lists are, of course, selected. A full Bibliography is a great task, not yet attempted.
THE END
