Modern Machine-Shop Practice Part 84

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1218.]

Figs. 1218 and 1219 ill.u.s.trate this method of setting. A represents a piece of work requiring to be turned taper from B to C, and turned down to within 1/32 inch of the required size at E and F. If then we place the tool point H first at one end and then at the other, and insert the piece I and adjust the lathe so that the piece of metal I will just fit between the tool point and the work at each extreme end of the required taper part, the lathe will be set to the requisite taper as near as practicable without trying the work to the taper hole. The parallel part at the small end of the work should be turned as true as possible, or the marks may not be obliterated in finis.h.i.+ng the work.

Fig. 1220 (from _The American Machinist_) represents a gauge for setting the tailstock over for a taper. A groove is cut as at E and D, these diameters corresponding to the required taper; a holder A is then put in the tool point, and to this holder is pivoted the gauge B. The tailstock is set over until the point of B will just touch the bottom of the groove at each end of the work.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1219.]

To try a taper into its place, we either make a chalked stripe along it from end to end, smoothing the chalked surface with the finger, or else apply red marking to it, and then while pressing it firmly into its place, revolve it backwards and forwards, holding it the while firmly to its seat in the hole; we move the longest outwardly projecting end up and down and sideways, carefully noting at which end of the taper there is the most movement. The amount of such movement will denote how far the taper is from fitting the hole, while the end having the least movement will require to have the most taken off it, because the fulcrum off which the movement takes place is the highest part, and hence requires the greatest amount of metal to be taken off.

Having fitted a taper as nearly as possible with the lathe tool, that is to say, so nearly that we cannot find any movement or unequal movement at the ends of the taper (for there is sure to be movement if the tapers do not agree, or if the surfaces do not touch at more than one part of their lengths), we must finish it with a fine smooth file as follows: After marking the inside of the hole with a very light coat of red marking, taking care that there is no dirt or grit in it, we press the taper into the hole firmly, forcing it to its seat while revolving it backwards and forwards.

By advancing it gradually on the forward stroke, the movement will be a reciprocating and yet a revolving one. The work must then be run in the lathe at a high speed, and a smooth file used to ease off the mark visible on the taper, applying the file the most to parts or marks having the darkest appearance, since the darker the marks the harder the bearing has been. Too much care in trying the taper to its hole cannot be taken, because it is apt to mark itself in the hole as though it were a correct fit when at the same time it is not; it is necessary therefore at each insertion to minutely examine the fit by the lateral and vertical movement of projecting part of the taper, as before directed.

A taper or cone should be fitted to great exact.i.tude before it is attempted to grind it, the latter process being merely intended to make the surfaces even.

For wrought-iron, cast-iron, or steel work, oil and emery may be used as the grinding materials (for bra.s.s, burnt sand and water are the best).

The oil and emery should be spread evenly with the finger over the surfaces of the hole and the taper; the latter should then be placed carefully in its place and pressed firmly to its seat while it is being revolved backwards and forwards, and slowly rotated forward by moving it farther during the forward than during the backward movement of the reciprocating motion.

After about every dozen strokes the taper should be carefully removed from the hole and the emery again spread evenly over the surfaces with the finger, and at and during about every fourth one of the back strokes of the reciprocating movement the taper should be slightly lifted from its bed in the hole, being pressed lightly home again on the return stroke, which procedure acts to spread the grinding material and to make the grinding smooth and even. The emery used should be about number 60 to 70 for large work, about 80 to 100 for small, and flour emery for very fine work.

Any attempt to grind work by revolving it steady in one direction will cause it to cut rings and destroy the surface.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1220.]

Referring to the second method, all that is necessary in setting a former or taper attachment bar is to set it out of line with the lathe shears to half the amount of taper that is to be turned, the bar being measured along a length equal to that of the work. Turning tapers with a bar or taper-turning attachment possesses the advantage that the tailstock not being set over, the work centres are not thrown out of line with the live centres, and the latter are not subject to the wear explained with reference to Fig. 1214. Furthermore, the tailstock being kept set to turn parallel, the operator may readily change from turning taper to turning parallel, and may, therefore, rough out all parts before finis.h.i.+ng any of them, and thus keep the work more true, whereas in turning tapers by setting the tailstock over we are confronted by the following considerations:--

If we turn up and finish the plain part first, the removing of the skin and the wear of the centres during the operation of turning the taper part will cause the work to run out of true, and hence it will not, when finished, be true; or if, on the other hand, we turn up the taper part first, the same effects will be experienced in afterwards turning the plain part. We may, it is true, first rough out the plain part, then rough out the taper part, and finish first the one and then the other; to do this, however, we shall require to set the lathe twice for the taper and once for the parallel part.

It is found in practice that the work will be more true by turning the taper part the last, because the work will alter less upon the lathe centres when changed from parallel to taper turning than when changed from the latter to the former. In cases, however, in which the parts fitting the taper part require turning, it is better to finish the parallel part last, and to then turn up the work fastened upon the taper part while it is fast upon its place: thus, in the case of a piston rod and piston, were we to turn up the parallel part of the rod first and the taper last, and the centres altered during the last operation, when the piston head was placed upon the rod, and the latter was placed in the lathe, the plain part or stem would not run true, and we should require to true the centres to make the rod run true before turning up the piston head. If, however, we first rough out the plain part or stem of the rod, and then rough out and finish the taper part, we may then fasten the head to its place on the rod, and turn the two together; that is to say, rough out the piston head and finish its taper hole; then rough out the parallel part of the rod, but finish its taper end. The rod may then be put together and finished at one operation; thus the head will be true with the rod whether the taper is true with the parallel part of the rod or not. With a taper-turning attachment the rod may be finished separately, which is a great advantage.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1221.]

If, however, one part of the length of a taper turning attachment is much more used than another, it is apt to wear more, which impairs the use of the bar for longer work, as it affects its straightness and causes the slide to be loose in the part most used, and on account of the wear of the sliding block it is proper to wind the tool out from its cut on the back traverse, or otherwise the tool may cut deeper on the back than on the forward traverse, and thus leave a mark on the work surface.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1222.]

Referring to the third method, a compound slide rest provides an excellent method of turning tapers whose lengths are within the capacity of the upper slide of the compound rest, because that slide may be used to turn the taper, while the ordinary carriage feed may be used for the parallel parts of the work, and as the tailstock does not require to set over, the work centres are not subject to undue wear.

If the seat for the upper slide of the rest is circular, and the taper is given in degrees of angle, a mark may be made on the seat, and the base of the upper slide may be marked in degrees of a circle, as shown in Fig. 1221, which will facilitate the setting; or the following construction, which is extracted from _Mechanics_, may be employed.

Measure the diameter of the slide rest seat, and scribe on a flat surface a circle of corresponding diameter. Mark its centre, as A in Fig. 1222, and mark the line A B. From the centre A mark the point B, whose radius is that of the small end of the hole to be bored. Mark the length of the taper to be turned on the line A G and draw the line G D distant from A B equal to the diameter of the large end of the hole to be bored. Draw the line B D. Then the distance E F is the amount the rest must be swiveled to turn the required taper.

It is obvious that the same method may also be used for setting the rest.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1223.--Top View.]

Referring to the fourth method, by having an upper bed or base plate for the head and tailstock, so that the line of lathe centres may be set at the required angle to the [V]s or slides on which the carriage traverses, it affords an excellent means of turning tapers, since it avoids the disadvantages mentioned with regard to other systems, while at the same time it enables the turning of tapers of the full length of the carriage traverse, but it is obvious that the head and tailstock are less rigidly supported than when they are bolted direct to the lathe shears.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1224.--End View.]

In turning tapers it is essential that the tool point be set to the exact height of the work axis, or, in other words, level with the line of centres. If this is not the case the taper will have a curved outline along its length. Furthermore, it may be shown that if a straight taper be turned and the tool be afterwards either raised or lowered, the amount of taper will be diminished as well as the length being turned to a curve.

Figs. 1223 and 1224 demonstrate that the amount of taper will be changed by any alteration in the height of the tool. In Fig. 1223, A B represents the line of centres of the spindle of a lathe, or, in other words, the axis of the work W, when the lathe is set to turn parallel; A C represents the axis of the work or cone when the lathe tailstock is set over to turn the taper or cone; hence the length of the line C B represents the amount the tailstock is set over. Referring now to Fig.

1224, the cone is supposed to stand level, as it will do in the end view, because the lathe centres remain at an equal height from the lathe bed or [V]s, notwithstanding that the tailstock is set over. The tool therefore travels at the same height throughout its whole length of feed; hence, if it is set, as at T, level with the line of centres, its line of feed while travelling from end to end of the cone is shone by the line A B. The length of the line A B is equal to the length of the line B C Fig. 1223. Hence, the line A B, Fig. 1224, represents two things: first, the line of motion of the point of tool T as it feeds along the cone, and second its length represents the amount the work axis is out of parallel with the line of lathe centres. Now, suppose that the tool be lowered to the position shown at I; its line of motion as it feeds will be the line C D, which is equal in length to the line A B. It is obvious, therefore, that though the tool is set to the diameter of the small end, it will turn at the large end a diameter represented by the dotted circle H. The result is precisely the same if the taper is turned by a taper-turning attachment instead of setting the tailstock out of line.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Side View. Fig. 1225. End View.]

The demonstration is more readily understood when made with reference to such an attachment as the one just mentioned, because the line A B represents the line of tool feed along the work, and its length represents the amount the attachment causes the tool to recede from the work axis. Now as this amount depends upon the set-over of the attachment it will be governed by the degree of that set over, and is, therefore, with any given degree, the same whatever the length of the tool travel may be. All that is required, then, to find the result of placing the tool in any particular position, as at I in the end view, is to draw from the tool point a line parallel to A B and equal in length to it, as C D. The two ends of that line will represent in their distances from the work axis the radius the work will be turned to at each end with the tool in that position. Thus, at one end of the line C D is the circle K, representing the diameter the tool I would turn the cone at the small end, while at the other end the dotted circle H gives the diameter at the large end that the tool would turn to when at the end of its traverse. But if the tool be placed as at T, it will turn the same diameter K at the small end, and the diameter of the circle P at the large end.

We have here taken account of the diameters at the ends only of the work, without reference to the result given at any intermediate point along the cone surface, but this we may now proceed to do, in order to prove that a curved instead of a straight taper is produced if the tool be placed either above or below the line of lathe centres.

In Fig. 1225, D E F C represents the complete outline of a straight taper, whose diameter at the ends is represented in the end view by the outer and inner circles. Now, a line from A to B will represent the axis of the work, and also the line of tool point motion or traverse, if that point is set level with the axis. The line I K in the end view corresponds to the line A B in the side view, in so far that it represents the line of tool traverse when the tool point is set level with the line of centres. Now, suppose the tool point to be raised to stand level with the line G H, instead of at I K, and its line of feed traverse be along the line G H, whose length is equal to that of I K. If we divide the length of G H into six equal divisions, as marked from 1 to 6, and also divide the length of the work in the side view into six equal divisions (_a_ to _f_), we shall have the length of line G H in the first division in the end view (that is, the length from H to G), representing the same amount or length of tool traverse as from the end B of the cone to the line A in the side view. Now, suppose the tool point has arrived at 1; the diameter of work it will turn when in that position is evidently given by the arc or half-circle _h_, which meets the point 1 on G H. To mark that diameter on the side view, we first draw a horizontal line, as _h_ _p_, just touching the top of _h_; a perpendicular dropped from it cutting the line A B, gives the radius of work transferred from the end view to the side view. When the tool point has arrived at 2 on G H in the end view, its position will be shown in the side view at the line _b_, and the diameter of work it will turn is shown in the end view by the half-circle _k_. To transfer this diameter to the side view we draw the line _k_ _g_, and where it cuts the line _b_ in the side view is the radius of the work diameter when the tool has arrived at the point _b_ in the side view. Continuing this process, we mark half-circles, as _l_, _m_, _n_, _o_, and the lines _l_ _r_, _m_ _s_, _n_ _t_, _o_ _u_, by means of which we find in the side view the work radius when the tool has arrived at _c_, _d_, _e_, and _f_ respectively. All that remains to be done is to draw on the side view a line, as _u_ E, that shall pa.s.s through the points. This line will represent the outline of the work turned by the tool when its height is that denoted by G H. Now, the line _u_ E is shown to be a curve, hence it is proved that with the tool at the height G H a curved, and not a straight, taper will be turned.

It may now be proved that if the tool point is placed level with the line of centres, a straight taper will be turned. Thus its line of traverse will be denoted by A B in the side view and the line I K in the end view; hence we may divide I K into six equal divisions, and A B into six equal divisions (as _a_, _b_, _c_, &c.). From the points of division I K, we may draw half-circles as before, and from these half-circles horizontal lines, and where the lines meet the lines of division in the side view will be points in the outline of the work, as before. Through these points we draw a line, as before, and this line C F, being straight, it is proven that with the tool point level with the work axis, it will turn a straight taper.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Top View. Fig. 1226. End View.]

It may now be shown that it is possible to turn a piece of work to a curve of equal curvature on each side of the middle of the work length.

Suppose, for example, that the cutting tool stands on top of the work, as in the end view in Fig. 1226, and that while the tool is feeding along the work it also has a certain amount of motion in a direction at right angles to the work axis, so that its line of motion is denoted by the line B B in the top view. The outline of the work turned will be a curve, as is shown in Fig. 1227, in which the line of tool traverse is the line C D. Now the amount of tool motion that occurs during this traverse in a direction at right angles to the work axis is represented by the line F E, because the upper end is opposite to the upper end of C D, while the lower end is opposite the lower end of C D. We may then divide one-half of the length of F E into the divisions marked from 1 to 6. Now, as we have taken half the length of F E, we must also take half the length of the work and divide it into six equal divisions marked from _a_ to _f_. Now, suppose the tool point to stand in the line F S in the end view, its position in the top view will be at C. When it is at 1 on the end view it will have arrived at _p_ in the top view. The radius of work it will then turn is shown in the end view by the length of line running from 1 to the work centre. Take this length, and from _a_ in the work axis set it off on the line _a_ _h_, and make the length equal the height of 1 S. In like manner, when the tool point has arrived at 2, the radius it will cut the work is shown by the length of line _i_; hence from 2 on the work axis we may set off the length of 2 S, making 2 S and _b_ _i_ of equal length. Continuing this process, we make the length of _c_ _k_ equal that of 3 S, the length of _d_ _l_ equal 4 S, and so on.

All that remains then is to draw a line, _o_ _g_, that shall meet the tops of these lines. This line will show the curve to which that half of the work length will be turned to. The other half of the work length will obviously be turned to the same curvature.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1227.]

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1228.]

It is obvious that the curvature of the work outline will be determined by the proportion existing between the length of the work and the amount of tool motion in a direction at right angles to the work axis, or, in other words, between the length of the work and that of the line F E. It is evident, also, that with a given amount of tool motion across the work, the curvature of outline turned will be less in proportion as the work length is greater. Now, suppose that the smaller and the larger diameter of the work, together with its length, are given, and it is required to find how much curvature the tool must have, we may find this and work out the curve it will cut by the construction shown in Fig.

1228, in which the circle K is the smallest and the circle P the largest diameter. The line _m_ C is drawn to just touch the perimeter of K, and this at once gives the amount of cross-motion for the tool. Hence, we may draw the line _m_ B and C B, and from their extremities draw the line B B representing the path of traverse of the tool point. We may then obtain the full curve on one side of the work by dividing one-half the length of _m_ C into six equal divisions and proceeding as before, except that we have here added the lines of division in the second half as from _f_ to _l_. It will be observed that the centre of the curve is at the point where the tool point crosses the axis of the work; hence, by giving to the tool more traverse on one side than on the other of the work axis, the location of the smallest point of work diameter may be made to fall on one side of the middle of the work length.

In either turning or boring tapers that are to drive or force in or together, the amount to be allowed for the fit may be ascertained, so that the work may be made correct without driving each piece to its place to try its fit.

Suppose, for example, that the pieces are turned, and the holes are to be reamed, then the first hole reamed may be made to correct diameter by fit and trial, and a collar may be put on the reamer to permit it to enter the holes so far and no farther.

A taper gauge may then be made as in Fig. 1229, the line a representing the bore of the hole, and line B the diameter of the internal piece, the distance between the two being the amount found by trial to be necessary for the forcing or driving. The same gauge obviously serves for testing the taper of the holes reamed.

CHUCKED OR FACE PLATE WORK.--This cla.s.s of work requires the most skillful manipulation, because the order in which the work may most advantageously proceed and the method of chucking are often matters for mature consideration.

[Ill.u.s.tration: Fig. 1229.]

In a piece of work driven between the lathe centres, the truth of any one part may be perceived at any time while operating upon the others, but in chucked work, such is not always the case, and truth in the work is then only to be obtained by holding it truly. Again, the work is apt to be sprung or deflected by the pressure of the devices holding it, and furthermore the removal of the skin or surface will in light work sometimes throw it out of true as the work proceeds, the reason being already given, when referring to turning plain cylindrical work.

TO TURN A GLAND.--There are three methods of turning a gland: first, the hole and the face on the outside of the f.l.a.n.g.e may be turned first, the subsequent turning being done on a mandrel; second, the hole only may be bored at the first chucking, all the remaining work being done on a mandrel; and, third, the hole, hub, and one radial face may be turned at one chucking, and the remaining face turned at a separate chucking.

If the first plan be adopted, any error in the truth of the mandrel will throw the hole out of true with the hub, which would be a serious defect, causing the gland to jamb against one side of the piston rod, and also of the gland bore. The same evil is liable to result from the second method; it is best, therefore, to chuck the gland by the hub in a universal chuck, and simply face the outer face of the f.l.a.n.g.e, and also its edge. The gland may then be turned end for end, and the hole, the hub, the inside radial f.l.a.n.g.e face, and the hub radial face, may then all be turned at one chucking; there is but one disadvantage in this method, which is that the gland must be unchucked to try its fit in the gland hole, but if standard gauges are used such trial will not be necessary, while if such is not the case and an error of measurement should occur, the gland may still be put on a mandrel and reduced if necessary.

In either method of chucking, the fit of the hole to the rod it is intended for cannot be tested without removing the gland from the chuck.

TO TURN A PLAIN CYLINDRICAL RING ALL OVER IN A UNIVERSAL CHUCK.--Three methods may be pursued in doing this simple job: first, the hole may be bored at one chucking, and the two radial faces and the circ.u.mference turned at a second chucking; second, the diameter may be turned, first on the hole and two radial faces turned at a second chucking; and third the hole and one radial face may be turned at one chucking, and the diameter and second radial face at a second chucking. The last method is best for the following reasons. The tool can pa.s.s clear over the surfaces at each chucking without danger of coming into contact with the chuck jaws, which would cause damage to both; second, at the last chucking, the chuck jaws being inside the ring, the latter may be tested for truth with a pointer fixed in the tool rest, and therefore set quite true.

It is obvious that at neither chucking should the ring be set so far within the chuck jaws that there will be danger of the tool touching them when turning the radial face.