Finland's War of Choice Part 14

In announcing the surrender to his troops Bohme described the 20th Mountain Army as undefeated, and one that only accepted the dictates of the enemy for the greater national interest. In a message to OKW on May 10 complaining about the severity of the surrender terms, he concluded with "Woe to the vanquished."34

EPILOGUE.

Germany and Scandinavia in World War II.

The war in Finland cannot be considered as an isolated event, but must be viewed in relation to German goals in Scandinavia as a whole. The northern theater of war presented Germany with four major strategic advantages: Access to mineral resources-Swedish iron and Finnish nickel.

Expansion of its base for naval operations against the Allies.

Control of the Baltic and Baltic approaches.

Interdiction of the Murmansk supply route after the German attack on the Soviet Union.

Ziemke claims that the Germans, for a variety of reasons, did not accomplish their objectives and that the German presence in Scandinavia was not enough to discourage its enemies from focusing their activities in other directions.1 These observations neglect important points by concentrating on specific strategic considerations. It is in the general realm of German interests that we have to look for answers to the question of what Germany perceived as its advantages in Scandinavia. Walter Hubatsch claims that the flow of high-grade Swedish ore made the great battles of 194244 possible for the Germans and a similar claim can undoubtedly be made for Finnish nickel as well as the supply of finished products from Sweden, such as ball bearings.2 We have to place ourselves in the position of the German planners and ask what the situation would have been for the Germans if they had not moved into Scandinavia. By failing to do so, the Allies could have exerted pressure on Sweden and Finland and may well have succeeded in eliminating Swedish export of iron ore and Finnish export of nickel to Germany. An Allied presence in Scandinavia would probably have kept Finland from joining Germany in its attack on the Soviet Union and Stalin would not have had to worry about an arctic front or a threat to his supply lines from the west. A further advantage in the minds of German planners was the protection of Germany's northern flank, and this they ranked quite high. Allied air power from Scandinavia would have been very effective in the Baltic and over German ports on the southern sh.o.r.es of that sea.

Whether the German preoccupation with Scandinavia was an unnecessary drain on its resources is debatable. Hitler's exaggerated concern for an invasion of the north must be ranked as a major error. The enormous resources that Germany poured into this theater drained them away from other areas. It took a reinforced army and vast expenditures in resources to defend Norway. Another army was tied down in Finland from 1941. These armies were trapped into defensive missions that had virtually no influence on the outcome of the war.

Finland's Decisions.

The debate over whether Finland's decision to side with Germany in its attack on the Soviet Union in June 1941 was made out of necessity, or simply reflected a conscious choice, has continued unabated for nearly 65 years and there is no unanimity. Wuorinen's book in 1948-actually written by Professor Arvi Korhonen-states that "Finland had been drawn into the war-against her will-..."3 In another place he describes the start of hostilities in 1941 as "Finland, having fallen victim to an unprovoked attack, could in the beginning have no other 'war aims' than to repel the attack...."4 Fifty-four years later Vehvilainen writes that "there was no way that Finland could have avoided becoming involved in a new war" and that at the beginning of their contacts with the Germans in 1940 "Finland's aims were to get security guarantees from Germany."5 He goes on to state that "Without realizing the real nature of National Socialism and Hitler's war aims, the Finns fought to preserve their way of life and to ensure security from what they considered an eternal threat from the east."6 A few comments on what has been written by these authors-and others-are in order. The opening of hostilities by the Soviets was provoked and Mannerheim and other leaders admitted as much in a conversation (between Mannerheim, Tanner, Linkomies, General Walden, and General Heinrichs) on August 9, 1943-as I quote in Chapter 2. There were several German divisions in the country with the rather obvious intention to initiate ground operations and the Finns had ordered a general mobilization several days earlier. The first air attacks against Soviet targets were carried out by German aircraft operating from Finnish bases or through Finnish airs.p.a.ce. The German and Finnish navies had already begun laying mines in the Gulf of Finland.

Vehvilainen's claims that the Finns were unaware of the real nature of National Socialism or Germany's war aims are likewise absurd. What were they doing while Germany swallowed up Czechoslovakia, invaded Poland, overran their fellow Scandinavians in Denmark and Norway, and invaded the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, France, and the Balkans. While the details of the persecution of the Jews and others may not have been known, enough was known about the conditions in Germany for them to make up their minds about the nature of National Socialism.

As far as Germany's war aims are concerned, they were well known to some Finnish leaders. See, for example, General Heinrichs' pro memoria of June 3, 1941, and the verbal comments he made at that time which I quote from in Chapter 1.

Finland's initial aim may well have been to obtain security guarantees from Germany after it became isolated. They should have known that such guarantees would carry a costly price tag. The aim of security guarantees quickly gave way to the recapture of lost territories and the conquest of East Karelia. Wuorinen writes that "Finland's military objectives were strictly limited: her own defense and security. At no time during the war did the country want to go, or go, any further than these objectives."7 I believe that this erroneous explanation is put to rest in this book.

The notion that Finland fought a separate war is also absurd to an outsider although many Finns undoubtedly believed it. The notion that a small nation such as Finland launched an attack on the Soviet Union and surprisingly found itself at the side of Germany is hard to swallow. Nevertheless, the fact that they did not have a formal alliance with Germany eventually served Finland well and gave them a special status among the nations that fought at Germany's side.

There are no doubts that the Soviets followed a policy that made Finland fear for its safety. This short-sighted policy helped propel isolated Finland into the arms of Germany. For example, at the time of the Moscow Peace in March 1940, Finland approached Sweden and Norway about a defensive alliance. Things looked promising until the Soviet Union vetoed the idea. Such an alliance may have worked to the great advantage of the Soviets by causing the Germans to have second thoughts about their planned attack on Denmark and Norway.

In October 1940, after Norway was removed from the calculations by the German invasion, Sweden agreed to a defensive alliance and political union with Finland provided the latter agreed not to wage a war of revenge against the Soviet Union. Finland agreed. The idea was again resisted by the Soviet Union and this time also by Germany (see Chapter 1).

Proceeding with this military/political union even against the wishes of the Soviet Union and Germany presented the Finns with an option that might have proved viable. It is unlikely that the Soviet Union would have attacked both Finland and Sweden since it would have threatened vital German interests and may have seriously affected their relations with both the UK and the US. Germany is also unlikely to have resorted to military measures in view of the potential loss of Swedish iron and Finnish nickel at a time when these were sorely needed by the German armament industry.

Later, the Soviets had second thoughts as Finland drew closer to Germany. A Finland tied to a neutral Sweden no longer looked like a bad option. They told Finland that they were prepared to re-evaluate their earlier opposition to a Swedish/Finnish defensive alliance and political union. This was in May 1941, too late to change Finland's new orientation to Germany.8 Finland, unlike many of Germany's allies, retained its independence after the war and the terms of peace could well have been harsher. The reason was probably not any sense of magnanimity on the part of the Soviet Union. Credit must be given to the fighting quality of the Finnish soldiers and the Soviets may have concluded that it was not worth another costly offensive to impose harder terms. Credit must also be given to the fact that the Finns still enjoyed considerable sympathy in the western democracies, especially in the US. This may have served as a brake on Soviet policy.

German Mistakes in 194041.

Germany's a.s.sociation with Finland is a cla.s.sic study in how not to enter into a military coalition. Since Germany had decided to bring Finland into the war on its side in July 1940, sufficient time existed to iron out issues presented in coalition warfare. These include war aims, allotment of tasks, campaign plans, and command relations.h.i.+ps.

As demonstrated in this book, there were no operational agreements between Germany and Finland much past the opening salvoes in the war. That Finland made no effort to have these issues discussed and resolved prior to the outbreak of hostilities is understandable. Their aim was to maintain maximum flexibility in their coalition with Germany, and leaving things rather vague fit in well with this aim. It is much more difficult to understand why the German military planners did not insist on nailing down these issues. The most likely answer is that all were caught up in the rosy scenario of a quick campaign that would destroy the military potential of the Soviet Union. Therefore, the notion that no elaborate arrangements or understandings were necessary was a major miscalculation that caused friction within the coalition almost from the very beginning.

If Finland had recoiled at making such arrangements, it would have been infinitely better for the Germans to learn that as early as possible. That would have allowed them to adopt the plan for Operation Barbarossa along the lines of the one prepared by General Erich Marcks at OKH, discussed in Chapter 2. His plan recommended postponing Finnish partic.i.p.ation since the weight of the German attack would be in the south and center without a major drive to Leningrad. The antic.i.p.ated benefits from Finnish partic.i.p.ation along with the desire to control the Baltic Sea may have led to the dissipation of effort involved in three major drives into the Soviet Union.

The Germans had a very important lever that they could have used in the planning stages to get Finland to agree to support their two major goals of advances against the Murmansk Railroad and Leningrad. The Finns were eager to recover their lost territory, but would probably not have been able to do that while also defending the 500-kilometer long front in the arctic and in Lapland. This problem had become abundantly clear during the Winter War. With Germany taking over these fronts the Finns had sufficient forces to undertake the recovery of lost territories and the conquest of East Karelia. When leverage exists and is not used at the appropriate time, it is lost. The last time it could have been used was in 1942, to get the Finns to undertake operations against the Murmansk Railroad while German armies were making spectacular advances on all fronts. A German threat to withdraw from central Finland unless the Finns were more cooperative might have energized them.

It is a long-standing principle that each partner in a coalition must benefit from its members.h.i.+p. This was not the case in Finland. Finland benefited hugely in 1941 because of the German presence in their country, as described above. They benefited equally from the advance of Army Group North as it drew forces away from the Finnish fronts.

The Germans, on the other hand, reaped virtually no benefits from the coalition after the Finns recovered their lost territories and conquered East Karelia. The Finns refused to help the Germans against Leningrad and effectively did the same with respect to interdicting the Murmansk Railroad. The end result was that the Germans were left to dance to the Finnish fiddler. Their army in Lapland and the arctic was trapped both geographically and operationally. It did not have the strength to cut the Murmansk Railroad alone. That army could have served the German war cause better on other fronts. For Germany, Finland was a blind alley.

The Human Cost of the War.

The war in Finland was a costly experience in lives and resources for the Soviet Union, Finland, and Germany. Finnish losses amounted to 52,500 killed, 7,300 missing, and 148,000 wounded. This includes 800 killed and 3,000 wounded in engagements against the Germans in Lapland. To these must be added the losses in civilian lives. The German losses are placed at 84,000. About 16,400 of these were killed, 60,400 wounded, and 6,800 missing. Again, this includes the losses in their fights with the Finns in Lapland. The Soviet losses, as estimated by the official Finnish history of the war, were 270,000 killed and 550,000 wounded.9 Military Lessons.

The problems of coalition warfare, without a proper foundation, were glaringly apparent throughout the war in Finland. The failure to agree on war aims, lack of agreement on each nation's contribution to a common strategy, and the failure to achieve unity of command were age-old principles that were violated from the outset. This was a recipe for failure.

The Germans also failed to a.s.sign adequate forces to the theater of operations so as to quickly accomplish the all-important task of seizing Murmansk or interdicting the Murmansk Railroad. This may have been the result of an underestimation of Soviet capabilities and the problems caused by terrain and weather. However, the fact that Germany's military was overextended was obvious at the start and became worse as the war progressed.

The Germans grappled with the problem of establis.h.i.+ng and maintaining a clear-cut main effort from the very beginning. They conducted offensive operations from three areas with no definitive focus. The problems of adequate lines of communication made the support of large-scale operations difficult in all areas, but the best road network was in the Kandalaksha sector where there was also a railroad on both sides of the border. This is where the main effort with adequate forces should have been made, leaving forces in other sectors just sufficient to tie the Soviets down by presenting them with potential threats.

The problems caused by lack of lines of communication within Finland were exacerbated by long and inadequate routes for reinforcements and supplies. One gets the impression that these problems were not adequately addressed or solved in the planning process.

The war in Finland established a historical precedent. It was the first time-except for the campaigns around Narvik and in the Nordland Province of Norway in 1940-that major troop formations conducted prolonged operations in an arctic wilderness. The Germans found that mobility was severely restricted, that sweeping encirclements were not possible, and that momentum was difficult to regain once lost.

War in the arctic cannot be successfully conducted with troops who do not have specialized training and equipment. The human element predominates in warfare under the conditions found in the arctic. The Finns, native to the area, proved superior to the Germans in the kind of terrain and weather encountered in Finland.

While the effectiveness of machines and equipment is greatly reduced in arctic warfare, the Soviets proved in 1944 that it is possible to maneuver large units, including armor. There are no ideal periods for offensive military operations-climate and terrain always pose obstacles. From the standpoint of mobility, winter is often the best period for action but troops are confronted with the practical and psychological problem of severe cold and total darkness. Specially trained and equipped troops are required. The thaw invariably presents insurmountable problems for military operations in spring and early summer. One or two good lines of communication-such as the Murmansk Railroad-can prove decisive.

Long Term Effects.

Their experiences in World War II led the Scandinavian countries to take different paths in their foreign and defense policies. Sweden, which had successfully maintained its security through a flexible policy of armed neutrality, has continued that policy. Although it joined the European Union (EU) it has not joined the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). For Denmark and Norway there was no return to the policy of neutrality. They both embraced collective security and became charter members of NATO. Denmark also joined the EU while Norway, showing its independent streak, twice turned down members.h.i.+p through plebiscites. It remains one of only a few countries in western and central Europe that has not joined or pet.i.tioned to join that organization. Finland has also joined the EU but has continued a neutrality-oriented security policy by not joining NATO.

Appendix I.

COMPARATIVE GENERAL OFFICER RANKS1.

GERMAN FINNISH US.

Reichsmarshall2 Suomen Marsalkka3 None Generalfeldmarshall Sotamarsalkka4 General of the Army Generaloberst Kenraalieversti5 General General der Infanterie, der Artillerie, etc Jalkavaenkenraali Lieutenant General Generalleutnant Kenraaliluutnantti Major General Generalmajor Kenraalimajuri Brigadier General The German Waffen SS had its own general officer rank structure.

Below are the four ranks and their equivalent in the German Army: SS GERMAN ARMY.

Oberstgruppenfuhrer Generaloberst Obergruppenfuhrer General der Infanterie, der Artillerie, etc Gruppenfuhrer Generalleutnant Brigadefuhrer Generalmajor

Appendix II.

OPERATIONAL CODE NAMES.

Bagration Soviet summer offensive in Byelorussia in 1944.

Barbarossa German invasion of the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941.

Birke German plan for the 20th Mountain Army to North Finland in 1944.

Blaufuchs 1 & 2 Movement of x.x.xVI Corps forces from Germany and Norway to Finland in June 1941.

Claymore British/Norwegian operation in the Lofoten Islands in March 1941.

Harpune Nord & Sud German deception operations staged to divert attention from Operation Barbarossa from May to August 1941.

Jupiter Planned British operation against Pechenga and Banak in 194243.

Klabautermann German boat operations on Lake Ladoga to interdict Soviet supply and evacuation operations for Leningrad in the summer of 1942.

Lachsfang Proposed German-Finnish operations against the Murmansk Railroad at Kandalaksha and Belomorsk in the summer and fall of 1942.

Nordlicht Planned German operations against Leningrad in the fall of 1942.

Nordlicht Withdrawal of the 20th Mountain Army from Finland to Norway, October 1944-January 1945.

Panther Line Narva River-Lake Peipus line of German field fortifications constructed in the fall of 1943.

Parkplatz Proposed German operations against Leningrad in the spring of 1943.

Platinfuchs Operations by Mountain Corps Norway in 1941.

Polarfuchs Operations of German x.x.xVI Corps in 1941.

Renntier German plan for the occupation of Pechenga, June 1941.

Silberfuchs Operations of Army of Norway (including Finnish III Corps) out of Finland in 1941.

Tanne Ost German plan for the occupation of Suursaari Island in 1944.

Tanne West German plan to occupy the land Islands in 1944.

Wiesengrund Proposed German occupation of the Rybachiy Peninsula in the summer of 1942.

Zittadelle German operation against the Kursk salient in southern Russia in July 1943.

Appendix III.

FINNISH AND RUSSIAN GEOGRAPHIC NAMES.

A problem encountered in writing this book was dealing with the names of places in territories now under Russian rule. In most cases the names have changed. Finnish references, including their military atlases, understandably use the former Finnish names while modern atlases give the Russian names. This created a problem because not all the names used in Finnish references can be located on an atlas and furthermore, one cannot be absolutely sure that one is dealing with the same place. Also, some of the places mentioned have apparently been depopulated and do not appear on maps.

With the help of the Finnish Emba.s.sy in Was.h.i.+ngton, D.C., and Jukka Juutinen in Finland, I have been able to come up with a list of Finnish names and their Russian equivalent for some of the places in question. The list is far from complete.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.

Beaumont, Joan. Comrades in Arms: British Aid to Russia 194145 (London: Davis Poynter, 1980) Bellamy, Chris. Absolute War. Soviet Russia in the Second World War (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2007) Beranek, August von. Mannerheim (Berlin: Luken & Luken, 1942) Bergstrom, Christer. Bagration to Berlin: The Final Air Battles in the East 19441945 (Buress Hill: Cla.s.sic Publications, 2008) Blau, George. E. The German Campaign in Russia: Planning and Operations, 19401942 (Department of Army Pamphlet No. 20261a. Was.h.i.+ngton, D.C.: Department of Army, 1955) Blucher, Wipert von. Gesandter zwischen Diktatur und Demokratie (Wiesbaden: Limes Verlag, 1951) Born, Ernst von. Levnadsminnen (Helsingfors: Sonderstrom, 1954) Buchner, Alex. Gebirgsjager an allen Fronten (Hannover: A. Sponholtz, 1954) Carell, Paul. Hitler Moves East 19411943. Translated from the German by Ewald Osers (New York: Bantam Books, 1966) Carell, Paul. Scorched Earth. The Russian-German War 19431944. Translated from the German by Ewald Osers (New York: Ballantine Books, 1971) Churchill, Winston S. The Second World War. Six volumes (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 19481953) Clark, Alan. Barbarossa. The Russian-German Conflict 194145 (New York: The New American Library, Inc, 1966) Clausewitz, Karl von. On War. Translated from the German by O. J. Matthijs Jolles (Was.h.i.+ngton, D.C.: Combat Forces Press, 1953) Clausewitz, Karl von. On War. Edited and translated by Michael Howard and Peter Paret (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1976) Condon, Richard W. The Winter War. Russia against Finland (New York: Ballantine Books, 1972) Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg (Stuttgart: Militargeschichtliches Forschungsamt, 19831984) Deutsch, Harold C. Presidential address presented on December 27, 1946, at the 25th Anniversary meeting of Phi Alpha Theta, held in New York jointly with the meeting of the American Historical a.s.sociation Devins, Joseph H. Jr. The Vaagso Raid (Philadelphia: Chilton Book Company, 1968) Dietl, Gerda-Luise and Hermann, Kurt. General Dietl (Munchen: Munchner Buchverlag, 1951) Dupuy, Richard Ernest and Dupuy, Trevor N. The Encyclopedia of Military History from 3500 B.C. to the Present (New York: Harper & Row, 1970) Ellinger, Tage. Den Forunderlige Krig (Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, 1960) Erfurth, Waldemar. Der Finnische Krieg 19411944 (Wiesbaden: Limes Verlag, 1950) Erfurth, Waldemar. Problemet Murmanbanan under Finlands senaste Krig. Translated by Axel ohman (Helsingfors: Soderstrom & Co Forlagsaktiebolag, 1952) Erfurth, Waldemar. Surprise. Translated by Dr. Stefan T. Possony and Daniel Vilfroy (Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: Military Service Publis.h.i.+ng Company, 1943) Erfurth, Waldemar. The Last Finnish War (Written under the auspices of the Foreign Military Studies Branch of the Historical Division, Headquarters, European Command. Was.h.i.+ngton, D.C.: University Publications of America, Inc. 1979) Finland, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Development of Finnish-Soviet Relations During the Autumn of 1939 in the Light of Official Doc.u.ments (Helsinki: FMU, 1940) Frietsch, Carl Olof. Finlands odesr 19391943 (Helsingfors: Sonderstrom 1945) Gebhardt, James F. The Petsamo-Kirkenes Operation: Soviet Breakthrough and Pursuit in the Arctic, October 1944. Leavenworth Papers Number 17 (Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: Combat Studies Inst.i.tute, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, 1989) Germany, Auswartiges Amt. Doc.u.ments on German foreign policy, 19181945 (Was.h.i.+ngton: US Government Printing Office, 1954) Germany, Kriegsmarine. Fuehrer Conferences Dealing with the German Navy (Was.h.i.+ngton, D.C.: Office of Naval Intelligence, Navy Department, 1947) volumes for 19411944.

Germany. Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (Wehrmactfurungsstab). Kriegstagebuch des Oberkommando der Wehrmacht 19401945/ gefuhrt von Helmuth Greiner und Percy Ernst Schramm; im Auftrag des Arbeitskreises fur Wehrforschung herausgeben von Percy Ernst Schramm (Munchen: Bernard & Graefe, 1982. Four volumes in eight. Originally published: Frankfurt am Main: Bernard & Graefe, 19611965) Germany. Seekriegsleitung. War Diary of the German Naval Staff (Operations Division) (Was.h.i.+ngton, D.C.: Office of Naval Intelligence, 19481955) Gorlitz, Walter. History of the German General Staff 16571945. Translated by Brian Battershaw (New York: Praeger, Inc., 1957) Goltz, Rudiger von der. Als politischer General im Osten (Leipzig: K. F. Koehler, 1936) Gotaas, Birger. Fra 9. april til 7. juni. Episoder og opplevelser fra krigen i Norge. (Oslo: J. Dybwad, 1945) Greiner, Helmuth. Die Oberste Wehrmachtfuhrung 19391943 (Wiesbaden: Limes Verlag, 1951) Halder, Franz. Kriegstagebuch. Tagliche Aufzeichnungen des Chefs des Generalstabes des Heeres, 19391945. Generaloberst Halder. Three volumes (Hereausgeben vom Arbeitskreis fur Wehrforschung, Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer, 19621964).

Halder, Franz. The Halder War Diary 19391942. Edited by Charles Burd.i.c.k and Hans-Adolf Jacobsen (Novato, CA: Presidio Press, 1988) Ha.s.sel, von. The Von Ha.s.sel Diaries 19381944 (New York: Doubleday and Company, Inc. 1947) Hess, Wilhelm. Eismeefront 1941 (Heidelberg: Kurt Vowinkel Verlag, 1956) Hitler, Adolf. Hitler's Secret Conversations 19411944. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens (New York: Farrar, Strauss and Young, 1953) Holter, Hermann. Armee in der Arktis. Die Operationen der deutschen Lapland-Armee (Bad Nauheim: H. H. Podzun, 1953) Holter, Hermann. Armee in der Arktis. Die Operationen der deutschen Lapland-Armee. Second Edition (Munchen: Schild Verlag, 1977) International Military Tribunal. Trials of the Major War Criminals. (Nuremberg, 1947) Jacobsen, Alf R. Nikkel, jern og blod. Krigen i nord 19391945 (Oslo: Aschehoug, 2006) Jatkosodan historia (Porvoo: WSOY, 19881994) Jensen, Erling and Ulstein, Ragnar. Kompani Linge (Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag, 1962) Jokipii, M. Jatkosodan synty. Tutkimuksia Saksari ja Suomen sottlaallisesta yheitsyosta 194041 (Keuruu: Otava, 1987) Jones, Michael. Leningrad. State of Siege (New York: Basic Books, 2008) Juutilainen, Antti and Leskinen, Jari (editors). Jatkosodan pikkujattilainen (WSOY, 2005) Kaltenegger, Roland. Schicksalsweg und Kampf der "Bergschuh"Division. Die Kriegschronik der 7. Gebirgs-Division, vormals 99. leichte Infanterie-Division (Graz: Leopold Stocker Verlag, 1985) Kemp, Paul. Convoy. Drama in Arctic Waters (London: Arms and Armour, 1993) Kershaw, Ian. Fateful Choices. Ten Decisions that Changed the World, 19401941 (New York: The Penguin Press, 2007) Khrushchev, Nikita S. Khruschev Remembers. With an introduction, commentary and notes by Edward Crankshaw. Translated and edited by Strobe Talbott (New York: Bantam Books, Inc., 1971) Koskimaa, Matti. Veitsen teralla: vetaytyminen Lansi-Kannakselta ja Talin-Ihantalan suurtaistelu kesalla 1944 (Porvoo: W. Sonderstrom, 1993) Krautler, M. and Springenschmidt, Karl. Es war ein Edelweiss. Schicksal und Weg der zweiten Gebirgsdivision (Graz: Leopold Stocker Verlag, 1962) Krosby, H. Peter. Finland, Germany and the Soviet Union 19401941. The Petsamo Dispute (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1968) Kurowski, Franz. Generaloberst Dietl. Deutscher Heerfuhrer am Polarkreis (Berg am Starnberger See: Verlagsgemeinschaft Berg, 1990) Langer, William L. and Gleason, S. Everett. The Undeclared War 19401941 (New York: Harper, 1953) La.r.s.en, Stein Ugelvik, editor. Norsk Krigslexikon (Oslo, 1995) Lewin, Ronald. Hitler's Mistakes. (New York: William Morrow, 1986) Liddell Hart, B. H. History of the Second World War (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1971) Lossberg, Bernhard von. Im Wehrmachtfuhrungsstab. Dericht eines Generalstabsoffiziers (Hamburg: H. H. Nolke, 1949) Lunde, Henrik O. Hitler's Pre-emptive War. The Battle for Norway, 1940 (Drexel Hill: Casemate, 2008) Lundin, C. Leonard. Finland in the Second World War (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1957) Mann, Chris and Jorgensen, Christer. Hitler's Arctic War (New York: Thomas Dunne Books, St. Martin's Press, 2002) Mannerheim, Carl Gustaf von. The Memoirs of Marshal Mannerheim. Translated by Count Eric Lewenhaupt (New York: E. P. Dutton & Company, Inc., 1954) Mannerheim, Carl Gustaf von. Minnen. Two volumes (Stockholm, Norstedt, 1952) Manninen, Ohto. Molotovin c.o.c.ktail-Hitlerin sateenvarjo (Painatuskesus Oy, 1994) Maynard, Sir Charles. The Murmansk Venture (London: Hodder and Stoughton, Ltd., 1928) Meissner, Otto. Staatssekretar undter Ebert-Hindenburg-Hitler (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe Verlag, 1950) Meretskov, Krill A. Serving the People. Translated from the Russian by David Fidlon (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1971) Mikola, K. J. Finland's Wars During World War II (19391945) (A 32page undated pamphlet) Mikulskii, s.e.m.e.n Petrovich and Absaliamov, Minzakir. Nastupatel'nyee boi (Moscow, 1959) Olson, Alma Luise. The Background for Neutrality (New York: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1940) Procope, Hjalmar J. Editor. Fallande dom som friar (Stockholm: Fahlcrantz & Gumaelius, 1946) Raunio, Ari. Sotatoimet. Suomen sotien 193945 kulku kartoin (Kustantaja: GHenimap Oy, 2004) Rendulic, Lothar. Gekampft Gesiegt Geschlagen (Wels: Verlag Welsermuhl, 1952) Reynolds, David. In Command of History (New York: Random House, 2005) Roskill, Stephen Wentworth. The War at Sea 19391945 (London: HMSO, 1954) Salisbury, Harrison E. The 900 Days. The Siege of Leningrad (New York: Avon Books, 1970) Sandvik, Trygve. Operasjonene til lands i Nord-Norge 1940. 2 volumes (Oslo: Forsvarets Krigs.h.i.+storiske Avdeling, 1965) Schmidt, Paul. Hitler's Interpreter (New York: Macmillan, 1951) Schmidt, Paul. Statist auf diplomatischer Buhne, 192345 (Bonn: Athenaum Verlag, 1949) Schramm, Percy Ernst. Hitler: the man and the military leader. Translated, edited, and with an introduction by Donald S. Detwiler (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1971) Schuler, Emil. Mit dem Berschuh im Russland und Finland (Munchen: Eigenverlag Emil Schuler, 1959) Shearman, Hugh. Finland. The Adventures of a Small Power (London: Stevens and Sons Limited, 1950) s.h.i.+rer, William L. The Challenge of Scandinavia (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1955) s.h.i.+rer, William L. The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. A History of n.a.z.i Germany (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1960) Shtemenko, S. H. The Last Six Months. Russia's Final Battles with Hitler's Armies in World War II. Translated by Guy Daniels (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) Sontag, Raymond James and Beddie, James Stuart, editors. n.a.z.i-Soviet Relations 19391941 (German Foreign Office Doc.u.ments released by the US Department of State. New York: Didier, 1948) Speer, Albert. Erinnerungen (Berlin: Propylaen Verlag, 1969) Stenman, Kari and Keskinen, Kalevi. Luftwaffe Over Finland (Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books, 2001) Tanner, Vaino. Finlands Vag 19391940 (Stockholm: Albert Bonniers Forlag, 1950) Tanner, Vaino. Suyomen tie rauhaan 19431944 (Helsinki: Kustannusosakayeyhtio Tammi, 1952) Tippelskirch, Kurt von. Geschichte des Zweiten Weltkriges (Bonn: Athenaeum, 1956) Trevor-Roper, H. R., editor. Hitler's Wartime Directives 19391945 (London: Pan Books Ltd., 1966) Upton, Anthony F. Finland in Crisis, 19401941 (A Study in Small-Power Politics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1965) Vehvilainen, Olli. Finland in the Second World War. Between Germany and Russia. Translated by Gerard McAlester (New York: Palgrave Publishers Ltd, 2002) Warlimont, Walter. Inside Hitler's Headquarters 193945. Translated from the German by R. H. Barry (Novato, California: Presidio Press, 1964) Warner, Oliver. Marshall Mannerheim and the Finns (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1957) Wegner, Brnd. From Peace to War: Germany, Soviet Russia, and the World 19391941 (Providence, RI: Berghahn Books, 1997) Westerlund, Goran. Finland overlevde. Finlands Krig 19391945 i ord och bild (Helsingfors: Schildts Forlags Ab, 2007) Woodman, Richard. Arctic Convoys (London: John Murray Publishers Ltd., 1994) Wuorinen, John H. Finland and World War II, 19391940 (New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1948) Ziemke, Earl F. Stalingrad to Berlin: The German Defeat in the East (Army Historical Series. New York: Barnes & n.o.ble Books, 1996 [Original publication date 1968]) Ziemke, Earl F. The German Northern Theater of Operations 19401945 (Was.h.i.+ngton, D.C.: Department of the Army (Pamphlet No. 20-271), 1959)