BestLightNovel.com

What Is This Thing Called Science Part 10

What Is This Thing Called Science - BestLightNovel.com

You’re reading novel What Is This Thing Called Science Part 10 online at BestLightNovel.com. Please use the follow button to get notification about the latest chapter next time when you visit BestLightNovel.com. Use F11 button to read novel in full-screen(PC only). Drop by anytime you want to read free – fast – latest novel. It’s great if you could leave a comment, share your opinion about the new chapters, new novel with others on the internet. We’ll do our best to bring you the finest, latest novel everyday. Enjoy

Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Hanfling, 0. (1981). Logical Positivism. Oxford, Basil Blackwell. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.

Hertz, H. (1962). Electric Waves. New York, Dover.



Hirsch, P. B., Horne, R. W. and Whelan, M. J. (1956). "Direct Observation of the Arrangements and Motions of Dislocations in Aluminium", Philosophical Magazine, 1,677-84.

Hooke, R.(1665). Micrographia, London, Martyn and Allestry. Horwich, P. (1982). Probability and Evidence. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Howson, C. (ed.) (1976). Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1989). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. La Salle, Illinois, Open Court.

Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Hume, D. (1939). Treatise on Human Nature. London, Dent. Klein, U. (1995). "E. F. Geoffroy's Table of Different 'Raports' Ob- served Between Different Chemical Substances", Ambix, 42, 79-100.

Klein, U. (1996). "The Chemical Workshop Tradition and the Experimental Practice: Discontinuities Within Continuities",Science in Context, 9,251-87.

Kuhn, T. (1959). The Copernican Revolution, New York, Random House.

Kuhn, T. (1970a). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. (1970b). "Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research" in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 1-20.

Kuhn, T. (1970c). "Reflections on My Critics" in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 231-78.

Kuhn, T. (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. Lakatos, I. (1968). The Problem of Inductive Logic. Amsterdam, North Holland.

Lakatos, I. (1970). "Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes" in Lakatos and Musgrave (1970), pp. 91-196.

Lakatos, I. (1971). "Replies to Critics" in R. Buck and R. S. Cohen (eds), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 8. Dordrecht, Reidel.

Lakatos, I. (1976a). "Newton's Effect on Scientific Standards" in Worrall and Currie (1978a), pp. 193-222.

Lakatos, I. (1976b). Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lakatos, I. (1978). "History of Science and Its Rational Reconstruction" in Worrall and Currie (1978a), pp. 102-38.

Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Lakatos, I. and Zahar, E. (1975). "Why Did Copernicus' Programme Supersede Ptolemy's" in R. Westman (ed.), The Copernican Achievement. Berkeley, California, University of California Press. Larvor, B. (1998). Lakatos: An Introduction. London, Routledge.

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and Its Problems: Towards aTheory of Scientific Growth, Berkeley, University of California Press.

Laudan, L (1984). Science and Values: The Aims of Science and TheirRole in Scientific Debate. Berkeley, University of California Press, Leplin, J. (1984). Scientific Realism. Berkeley, University of California Press.

Locke, J. (1967). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London, Dent.

Maxwell, J. C. (1877). "The Kinetic Theory of Gases", Nature, 16, 245-46.

Maxwell, J. C. (1965). "Ill.u.s.trations of the Dynamical Theory of Gases" in W. D. Niven (ed.), The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 Volumes. New York, Dover.

Mayo, D. (1996). Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Menter, J. (1956). "The Direct Study by Electron Microscopy of Crystal Lattices and Their Imperfections", Proceedings of the Royal Society, A, 236,119-35.

Mill, J. S. (1975). On Liberty. New York, Norton.

Mulkey, M. (1979). Science and the Sociology of Knowledge. London, Allen and Unwin.

Musgrave, A. (1974a). "The Objectivism of Popper's Epistemology" in Schilpp (1974, pp. 560-96).

Musgrave, A. (1974b). "Logical Versus Historical Theories of Confirmation", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 25, 1-23.

Nersessian, N. (1984). Faraday to Einstein: Constructing Meaning in Scientific Theories. Dordrecht, Kluwer.

Newman, W. R. (1994). Gehennical Fire: The Lives of George Starkey, an American Alchemist in the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge, Ma.s.s., Harvard University Press.

Newman, W. R. and Principe, L. M. (1998). "Alchemy vs Chemistry: the Etymological Origins of a Historiographic Mistake", Early Science and Medicine, 3,32-65.

Nye, M. J. (1980). "N-rays: An Episode in the History and Psychology of Science", Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 11, 125-56.

O'Hear, A. (1980). Karl Popper London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Poincare, H. (1952). Science and Hypotheses. New York, Dover. Polanyi, M. (1973). Personal Knowledge. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Popper, K. R. (1969). Conjectures and Refutations. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Popper, K. R. (1972). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, Hutchinson.

Popper, K. R. (1974). "Normal Science and Its Dangers" in Lakatos and Musgrave (1974, pp. 51-8).

Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective Knowledge. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Popper, K. R. (1983). Realism and the Aim of Science. London, Hutchinson.

Price, D. J. de S. (1969). "A Critical Re-estimation of the Mathematical Planetary Theory of Ptolemy" in M. Clagett (ed.), Critical Problems in the History of Science. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.

Quine, W. V. 0. (1961). "Two Dogmas of Empiricism" in From a Logical Point of View. New York, Harper and Row.

Ravetz, J. R. (1971). Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Rosen, E. (1962). Three Copernican Treatises. New York, Dover.

Rosenkrantz, R. D. (1977). Inference, Method and Decision: Towards a Bayesian Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht, Reidel. Rowbotham, F. J. (1918). Story Lives of Great Scientists. Wells, Gardner and Darton.

Russell, B. (1912). Problems of Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Salmon, W (1966). The Foundations of Scientific Inference. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.

Schilpp, P. A. (ed.) (1974). The Philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, Illinois, Open Court.

Shapere, D. (1982). "The Concept of Observation in Science and Philosophy", Philosophy of Science, 49, 485-525.

Stove, D. (1973). Probability and Hume's Inductive Skepticism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Thomason, N. (1994). "The Power of ARCHED Hypotheses: Feyerabend's Galileo as a Closet Rationalist", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 45, 255-64.

Thomason, N. (1998). "1543 - The Year That Copernicus Didn't Predict the Phases of Venus" in A. Corones and G. Freeland (eds), 1543 and All That. Dordrecht, Reidel, Thurber, J. (1933). My Life and Hard Times. New York, Harper.

van Fraa.s.sen, Bas C. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

van Fraa.s.sen, Bas C. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Woolgar, S. (1988). Science: The Very Idea. London, Tavistock.

Worrall, J. (1976). "Thomas Young and the 'Refutation' of Newtonian Optics: A Case Study in the Interaction of Philosophy of Science and History" in Howson (1976, pp. 107-79).

Worrall, J. (1982). "Scientific Realism and Scientific Change" in Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 201-31.

Worrall, J. (1985). "Scientific Reasoning and Theory Confirmation" in J. Pitt (ed.), Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht, Reidel.

Won-all, J. (1988). "The Value of a Fixed Methodology", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 263-75.

Worrall, J. (1989a). "Fresnel, Poisson and the White Spot: The Role of Successful Predictions in Theory Acceptance" in D. Gooding, S. Schaffer and T. Pinch (eds), The Uses of Experiment: Studies of Experiment in Natural Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Worrall, J. (1989b). "Structural realism: The Best of Both Worlds?", Dialectica, 43, 99-124.

Worrall, J. and Currie, G. (eds) (1978a). Imre Lakatos, Philosophical Papers, Volume I: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Wonall, J. and Currie, G. (eds) (1978b). Imre Lakatos, Philosophical Papers , Volume 2: Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Zahar, E. (1973). "Why Did Einstein's Theory Supersede Lorentz's", British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24, 95-123 and 223-63.

Please click Like and leave more comments to support and keep us alive.

RECENTLY UPDATED MANGA

What Is This Thing Called Science Part 10 summary

You're reading What Is This Thing Called Science. This manga has been translated by Updating. Author(s): Alan F. Chalmers. Already has 844 views.

It's great if you read and follow any novel on our website. We promise you that we'll bring you the latest, hottest novel everyday and FREE.

BestLightNovel.com is a most smartest website for reading manga online, it can automatic resize images to fit your pc screen, even on your mobile. Experience now by using your smartphone and access to BestLightNovel.com